SciPost Submission Page
Mutually attracting spin waves in the square-lattice quantum antiferromagnet
by M. Powalski, K. P. Schmidt, G. S. Uhrig
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
| Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Götz Uhrig |
| Submission information | |
|---|---|
| Preprint Link: | http://arxiv.org/abs/1701.04730v2 (pdf) |
| Date accepted: | 2017-12-17 |
| Date submitted: | 2017-10-31 01:00 |
| Submitted by: | Uhrig, Götz |
| Submitted to: | SciPost Physics |
| Ontological classification | |
|---|---|
| Academic field: | Physics |
| Specialties: |
|
| Approach: | Theoretical |
Abstract
The Heisenberg model for S=1/2 describes the interacting spins of electrons localized on lattice sites due to strong repulsion. It is the simplest strong-coupling model in condensed matter physics with wide-spread applications. Its relevance has been boosted further by the discovery of curate high-temperature superconductors. In leading order, their undoped parent compounds realize the Heisenberg model on square-lattices. Much is known about the model, but mostly at small wave vectors, i.e., for long-range processes, where the physics is governed by spin waves (magnons), the Goldstone bosons of the long-range ordered antiferromagnetic phase. Much less, however, is known for short-range processes, i.e., at large wave vectors. Yet these processes are decisive for understanding high-temperature superconductivity. Recent reports suggest that one has to resort to qualitatively different fractional excitations, spinons. By contrast, we present a comprehensive picture in terms of dressed magnons with strong mutual attraction on short length scales. The resulting spectral signatures agree strikingly with experimental data.
Published as SciPost Phys. 4, 001 (2018)
Reports on this Submission
Anonymous Report 1 on 2017-11-30 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:1701.04730v2, delivered 2017-11-30, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.285
Strengths
1 - addresses a fundamental model of quantum magnetism, in particular the nature of the excitations beyond the low-energy regime
2 - provides a quantitative account for the the spin dynamics as measured in neutron scattering within the interacting magnon picture
3 - direct comparison to recent experimental work performed
4 - well motivated, clear exposition, and overall clearly written text
Weaknesses
only minor, formal points - see report
Report
In their manuscript Powalski, Schmidt and Uhrig present a detailed and quantitative analysis of the magon dispersion and the dynamical spectral function of the spin-1/2 Heisenberg model on the square lattice. While this system has been studied in much detail in the past, there has recently been renewed interest in this basic model of quantum magnetism. This concerns in particular the nature of the excitations beyond the low energy regime, for two main reasons: (i) there are systematic differences in the magnon dispersion at short wavelengths between both inelastic neutron scatting data on high quality samples and numerical findings of the Heisenberg model with respect to the theoretical description of the magnon dispersion within perturbative expansions in 1/S, such as extended spin wave theory. (ii) These differences were suggested recently to be in agreement with a scenario with a fractionalization of magnons into spinons in the corresponding energy range, which called the conventional magnon picture into question.
The authors here provide a substantial extension of their previous study of the excitations in the spin-1/2 Heisenberg model, based on non-perturbative continuous similarity transformations. Taking into account the transformation of the measurement operators (the authors refer to these corrections as vertex corrections), they account for the continuum contributions in addition to the single magnon excitations, in particular for the transverse scattering channel. The authors show that such an advanced treatment can indeed reproduce the experimentally observed features in the neutron scattering data to a remarkably high degree. In particular, they argue that the observed dispersions as well as the enhanced continuum contribution to the scattering signal closely atop the single magnon peak in the elevated energy range result from magnon-magnon interactions and the hybridization with the three-magnon continuum. The authors systematically verify both effects by examining separately the various contributions to the effective Hamiltoniam within the magnon picture.
The remarkable agreement with the experimental data demonstrates that the magnon picture does indeed account for the spin dynamics of the Heisenberg model on the square lattice without the need to resort to a possible fractionalization of the magnons into spinons. In my opinion, this is a very important result in view of both recent developements and the significant amount of previous work on this very fundamental model of quantum magnetism.
The paper is well written, and several useful details are conveniently provided in the appendices.
I would still ask the the authors to give the paper one more proofreading. This does not only concern the text, but there are also
apparent mistakes in the questions. An easy one to spot is the missing imaginary unit in Eq. 3, but I leave it to the authors
to ensure that, e.g., the indices in their flow-equations have been checked carefully. Furthermore,
(i) Ref. 16 should be cited at the end of the last paragraph that ends on page 3 ("Whe show that...experimental results").
(ii) On page 16, correct "this physics is also be found...".
(iii) In the caption of Fig. 6 replace "The upper diagram is ..."->"The upper left diagram is ..." and "additional order" -> "additional orders"
Requested changes
see the few items listed in the report