SciPost Submission Page
Anisotropic LandauLifshitz Model in Discrete SpaceTime
by Žiga Krajnik, Enej Ilievski, Tomaž Prosen, Vincent Pasquier
This is not the latest submitted version.
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
Authors (as registered SciPost users):  Žiga Krajnik 
Submission information  

Preprint Link:  https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.13863v1 (pdf) 
Date submitted:  20210505 18:12 
Submitted by:  Krajnik, Žiga 
Submitted to:  SciPost Physics 
Ontological classification  

Academic field:  Physics 
Specialties: 

Approaches:  Theoretical, Computational 
Abstract
We construct an integrable lattice model of classical interacting spins in discrete spacetime, representing a discretetime analogue of the lattice LandauLifshitz ferromagnet with uniaxial anisotropy. As an application we use this explicit discrete symplectic integration scheme to compute the spin Drude weight and diffusion constant as functions of anisotropy and chemical potential. We demonstrate qualitatively different behavior in the easyaxis and the easyplane regimes in the nonmagnetized sector. Upon approaching the isotropic point we also find an algebraic divergence of the diffusion constant, signaling a crossover to spin superdiffusion.
Current status:
Reports on this Submission
Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2021718 (Invited Report)
 Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:2104.13863v1, delivered 20210718, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.3255
Report
The authors construct an integrable spacetime discretization of the classical anisotropic LandauLifshitz model. The paper is timely, interesting and wellwritten. I have only a couple of scientific questions/comments:
1) On p68 the authors work with “Sklyanin variables” rather than canonical spin variables, which they justify on the grounds that it is “to facilitate the computation”. However, the spacetime continuum limits of the models in question are usually discussed in terms of standard spin variables. Also, the explicit formulas for the propagator in Appendix B seem much more complicated than the expressions that arise at the isotropic point in terms of standard spin variables Eqs. D3 and D4. Could the authors clarify why Sklyanin variables are more natural here, and what advantage they offer compared to ordinary spins?
2) On p.1819 the authors conjecture that (quasi)local charges protect the easyplane spin current, as for the spin1/2 quantum XXZ model. They also note that for their model, the standard local charges arising from the transfer matrix are spinflip even. However, this is also true in the quantum case. Could the authors elaborate on the obstacles to writing down classical Zcharges? These have been conjectured to arise as a semiclassical limit of quantum Zcharges for some time (e.g. Ref 71).
Finally, I noticed the following typos:
p2: Can be both > can both be,
p2, p13,p29: LandauLifhsitz > LandauLifshitz
Fig. 2 caption: comprising of > comprising
p6: Algebra A_q becomes nondegenerate> The algebra A_q…
p8: To enforce it, variable x > …the variable x
p8: formuale > formulae, p20: formuae > formulae
p10: simplifies considerably > simplify considerably
p11: There is a number > there are a number
p15: converging > converges
p15,16,17,20: consistently  > consistent
p20: corresponding the easyaxis > corresponding to the…
Author: Žiga Krajnik on 20210727 [id 1618]
(in reply to Report 1 on 20210718)We thank the referee for his careful reading of the manuscript and the positive appraisal of our work.
The answers to the referee's questions follow below:
(1) One can quickly recognize that, upon deforming the model, canonical spins are no longer the most natural variables to work with. We remind the reader that in the quantum setting, the Sklyanin algebra specifies the commutation relations for an elliptic quantum group, reducing to the widely known qdeformed su(2) algebra in the trigonometric limit. In the paper, we deal with Sklynain's Poisson algebra, which is its classical counterpart. The classical Lax matrix (and likewise the Hamiltonian) can be elegantly written in terms of Sklyanin variables (see also the textbook [61]), and this further facilitates its decomposition in terms of Weyl variables. The most economic explicit parametrization of the twobody map we could achieve was in terms of Sklyanin variables. We could not recognize any advantage of working with canonical spins. Those are only used at the very end in applications, given that we wish to interpret our model as discrete dynamics of magnetization.
(2) To avoid running to excessive length we had to come to a stop and not pursue this matter further. We note that the whole discussion regarding the existence and physical significance of "classical Zcharges" has been given before, e.g. in Ref.[71] (as also noted by the referee) which invokes the MazurSuzuki bound and invariance under the spinreversal transformation. Moreover in the present paper we do not imply that there is a fundamental obstacle to constructing such charges. We have made substantial progress on this question after the completion of the study. There are nonetheless certain delicate technical aspects that deserve a careful and focused discussion which we prefer to report elsewhere. We hope to have an update soon.