SciPost Submission Page
Scattering and Strebel graphs
by Pronobesh Maity
This is not the latest submitted version.
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Pronobesh Maity |
Submission information | |
---|---|
Preprint Link: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.09458v1 (pdf) |
Date submitted: | Feb. 19, 2022, 3:45 p.m. |
Submitted by: | Maity, Pronobesh |
Submitted to: | SciPost Physics |
Ontological classification | |
---|---|
Academic field: | Physics |
Specialties: |
|
Abstract
We consider a special scattering experiment with n particles in $\mathbb{R}^{n-3,1}$. The scattering equations in this set-up become the saddle-point equations of a Penner-like matrix model, where in the large $n$ limit, the spectral curve is directly related to the unique Strebel differential on a Riemann sphere with three punctures. The solutions to the scattering equations localize along different kinds of graphs, tuned by a kinematic variable. We conclude with a few comments on a connection between these graphs and scattering in the Gross-Mende limit.
Current status:
Reports on this Submission
Report #3 by Anonymous (Referee 3) on 2022-5-23 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:2108.09458v1, delivered 2022-05-23, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.5117
Strengths
Weaknesses
Report
In my opinion, the central results presented here are interesting and I recommend the paper for publication.
Requested changes
I suggest the author fix the following typo:
- In the second line of equation (3.3), the Vandermonde determinant should no longer be there in the measure, since it is meant to be included in the definition of the effective action.
Report #2 by Anonymous (Referee 2) on 2022-5-23 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:2108.09458v1, delivered 2022-05-23, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.5115
Strengths
Weaknesses
Report
To this end, the author chooses a specific kinematic configuration for massless scattering in $d$ space-time dimensions, which looks like a high-energy forward scattering of two particles into $N-2$ soft ones. It is symmetric among the $N-3$ out of the $N-2$ particles, which vastly simplifies the analysis of scattering equations. In order to realize this kinematics for large $N$, the number of dimensions $d$ needs to be large too. On top of $N$, this kinematics is parametrized by a positive variable $q$. The author considers the large-$N$ limit of scattering equations for different values of $q$.
The central result of this work is that in the large-$N$ limit, one can map the scattering question to a resolvent problem, not dissimilar to the ones encountered in Penner matrix models. This allows the author to show that solution of scattering equations arrange themselves along certain graphs, the Strebel graphs, on the Riemann sphere. Surprisingly, the specific topology of this graph depends discontinuously on the value of $q$: there are "phase transitions" at $q = 1/2$ and $q = 1$, which the author studies in the text. The first one is expected by the fact that one of the energies flips the sign, but the second one appears to remain unexplained. It is an interesting result overall.
As for the applications of this result, the most promising seems to be studying the geometry of the string worldsheet in the high-energy, large-$N$ limit, which is mentioned in Sec. 6. In principle, the are two obstacles with immediately applying the above analysis to this problem: that the kinematics cannot be realized in a fixed number of space-time dimensions; and that saddles the author finds are complex. The first one can be only cured with a more complicated (less symmetric) choice of kinematic configurations, but at this stage it is not clear one can leverage the connection to matrix models, which depended on the symmetry in the first place. The second question concerns the fact that solutions of scattering equations become complex, which means one needs to carefully study how the integration contour passes through such saddles to determine which of them are relevant, in addition to computing the phase weight of each saddle. These remain interesting problems for the future.
The material is already presented well and is suitable for publication, but below I give a few minor comments that should be addressed first.
In conclusion, this article contains new and interesting results in the area of worldsheet methods for scattering amplitudes. Therefore, I recommend it for publication in SciPost Physics.
Requested changes
-
In the introduction, the author gives a list of papers on solving scattering equations numerically, which should include the currently most efficient algorithm, described in the reference https://inspirehep.net/literature/1835427.
-
Above eq. (2.1), one might want to use $\mathbb{R}^{1,d-1}$ instead of $\mathbb{R}^{d-1,1}$ to avoid the ambiguity of which momentum component is the energy. Similar corrections should be made in the rest of the paper for consistency.
-
In the bottom limit in eq. (2.6) $j(!=1)$ should've been $j(!=i)$.
-
In eq. (3.13) and (3.18), the integration contour should be $\mathcal{C}$ instead of $C$.
-
Eq. (6.1) and (6.2) are exact classical solutions, so there should be no corrections included on the RHS. Even if they were included, they should be subleading in $\alpha'$ (not $s$). The phrase "one worldsheet insertion has been set at $\infty$" also doesn't make sense beyond genus zero, so I suggest removing it and make the summation go to $n$ instead of $n-1$.
-
In eq. (B.3), the range of the sum should be $i<j$ instead of $i \leq j$.
Author: Pronobesh Maity on 2022-06-18 [id 2590]
(in reply to Report 2 on 2022-05-23)I would like to thank the referee for his/her useful comments and for recommending publication of the paper. I have implemented the suggested changes in the resubmitted file.
Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2022-5-22 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:2108.09458v1, delivered 2022-05-22, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.5111
Strengths
Weaknesses
Report
The results are new and very well-presented. It should be accepted in SciPost Physics.
Requested changes
-
On page 3, it should have a clear statement how the on-shell conditions are satisfied.
-
A typo in eq(2.5), $\ne 1$ should be $\ne i$. In this formula, it should be more clear for $n (=N+3)$.
-
On page 4, regarding the scattering equation system, it should be clear that one deleted three redundant equations and fix three punctures $\sigma_{A,B,C}$ explicitly.
Author: Pronobesh Maity on 2022-06-18 [id 2589]
(in reply to Report 1 on 2022-05-22)I would like to thank the referee for his/her useful comments and for recommending publication of the paper. I have implemented the suggested changes in the resubmitted file.
Author: Pronobesh Maity on 2022-06-18 [id 2591]
(in reply to Report 3 on 2022-05-23)I would like to thank the referee for his/her useful comments and for recommending publication of the paper. I have implemented the suggested changes in the resubmitted file.