SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Dipolar magnetostirring protocol for three-well atomtronic circuits

by Héctor Briongos-Merino, Felipe Isaule, Montserrat Guilleumas, Bruno Juliá-Díaz

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Héctor Briongos-Merino
Submission information
Preprint Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.05301v2  (pdf)
Date submitted: April 23, 2025, 9:11 a.m.
Submitted by: Briongos-Merino, Héctor
Submitted to: SciPost Physics
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics - Theory
Approach: Computational

Abstract

We propose a magnetostirring protocol to create persistent currents on an annular system. Under this protocol, polar bosons confined in a three-well ring circuit reach a state with high average circulation. We model the system with an extended Bose-Hubbard Hamiltonian and show that the protocol can create circulation in an atomtronic circuit for a range of tunable parameters. The performance and robustness of this scheme are examined, in particular considering different interaction regimes. We also present a method for predicting the optimal protocol parameters, which improves protocol's scalability and enables its application to systems with large numbers of bosons. This overcomes computational limitations and paves the way for exploring macroscopic quantum phenomena.

Author indications on fulfilling journal expectations

  • Provide a novel and synergetic link between different research areas.
  • Open a new pathway in an existing or a new research direction, with clear potential for multi-pronged follow-up work
  • Detail a groundbreaking theoretical/experimental/computational discovery
  • Present a breakthrough on a previously-identified and long-standing research stumbling block

List of changes

- Increased axis label size on all figures.
- Missing relevant references were added.
- The last paragraph of section 2 was largely rewritten to better explain the necessity of performing numerical calculations.
- Several sentences of section 3 were rewritten to improve clarity.
- Several sentences of section 4.2 were rewritten to better explain the expected values of the protocol parameters.
- A sentence was added to the conclusions to address the experimental feasibility explicitly.
- The last paragraph of the conclusions was rewritten to stress extensions of this work.
- Small changes of style and typos were fixed throughout the text.
- The appendices were rewritten to improve clarity.
- The manuscript now uses the official Scipost template.

New references:
[12] Pelegrí G, Mompart J and Ahufinger V 2018 New Journal of Physics 20 103001
[36] Prasad S B, Bland T, Mulkerin B C, Parker N G and Martin A M 2019 Physical Review A 100 023625
[37] Prasad S B, Mulkerin B C and Martin A M 2021 Physical Review A 103 033322
[44] Góral K, Santos L and Lewenstein M 2002 Physical Review Letters 88 1
[45] Maik M, Buonsante P, Vezzani A and Zakrzewski J 2011 Physical Review A 84 053615
[46] Lahaye T, Pfau T and Santos L 2010 Physical Review Letters 104 170404
[47] Tonel A P, Ymai L H, Wittmann K, Foerster A and Links J 2020 SciPost Physics Core 2 003
[50] Ferrando A 2005 Physical Review E 72 036612
[55] Paraoanu G S 2003 Physical Review A 67 023607

Current status:
In voting

Reports on this Submission

Report #2 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2025-6-12 (Invited Report)

Report

The authors have addressed my comments and suggestions. They have also made a clear and visible effort to clarify the article, improving the more technical parts to answer Referee 2's critiques.

On Referee 2’s suggestion to transfer the paper to SciPost Physics Core: I understand the concern that the manuscript is quite technical in parts and relies on numerical optimisation, but I believe the protocol requires numerical simulation and analytical results would be very difficult to derive.

With this in mind, the manuscript is of relevance to the main SciPost Physics audience and can be published.

Recommendation

Publish (easily meets expectations and criteria for this Journal; among top 50%)

  • validity: high
  • significance: high
  • originality: high
  • clarity: high
  • formatting: excellent
  • grammar: excellent

Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 2) on 2025-6-11 (Invited Report)

Report

The authors have implemented several changes to their manuscript to improve both the readability and to clarify certain aspects of their work. Specifically, they addressed my comment on their work being too reliant on numerical optimization, introducing it in the last paragraph of Section 2. Furthermore, they revised section 4.2 to highlight the constraints enforced on the numerical optimization for the generation of currents. The authors also revised section 3, giving a better clarification of their protocol and making it easier to understand.

Overall, the revisions to the manuscript implemented by the authors address the comments I raised in the previous round. I think that the current version of the paper meets the criteria and standards to be published in SciPost Physics.

Recommendation

Publish (meets expectations and criteria for this Journal)

  • validity: -
  • significance: -
  • originality: -
  • clarity: -
  • formatting: -
  • grammar: -

Login to report or comment