SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Vacua, Symmetries, and Higgsing of Chern-Simons Matter Theories

by Fabio Marino, Marcus Sperling

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Marcus Sperling
Submission information
Preprint Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.02744v2  (pdf)
Date accepted: May 12, 2025
Date submitted: April 25, 2025, 2:13 p.m.
Submitted by: Sperling, Marcus
Submitted to: SciPost Physics
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • High-Energy Physics - Theory
Approach: Theoretical

Abstract

Three-dimensional supersymmetric Chern-Simons Matter (CSM) theories typically preserve $ \mathcal{N}=3$ supersymmetry but can exhibit enhanced $\mathcal{N}=4$ supersymmetry under special conditions. A detailed understanding of the moduli space of CSM theories, however, has remained elusive. This paper addresses this gap by systematically analysing the maximal branches of the moduli space of $\mathcal{N}=3$ and $\mathcal{N}=4$ CSM realised via Type IIB brane constructions. Firstly, for $\mathcal{N}=4$ theories with Chern-Simons levels equal $1$, the $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{Z})$ dualisation algorithm is employed to construct dual Lagrangian 3d $\mathcal{N}=4$ theories without CS terms. This allows the full moduli space to be determined using quiver algorithms that compute Higgs and Coulomb branch Hasse diagrams and associated RG flows. Secondly, for $\mathcal{N}=4$ theories with CS-levels greater $1$, where $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{Z})$ dualisation does not yield CS-free Lagrangians, a new prescription is introduced to derive two magnetic quivers, $\mathsf{MQ}_A $ and $\mathsf{MQ}_B$, whose Coulomb branches capture the maximal A and B branches of the original $\mathcal{N}=4$ CSM theory. Applying the decay and fission algorithm to $ \mathsf{MQ}_{A/B}$ then enables the systematic analysis of A/B branch RG flows and their geometric structures. Thirdly, for $\mathcal{N}=3$ CSM theories, one magnetic quiver for each maximal (hyper-K\"ahler) branch is derived from the brane system. This provides an efficient and comprehensive characterisation of these previously scarcely studied features.

Author indications on fulfilling journal expectations

  • Provide a novel and synergetic link between different research areas.
  • Open a new pathway in an existing or a new research direction, with clear potential for multi-pronged follow-up work
  • Detail a groundbreaking theoretical/experimental/computational discovery
  • Present a breakthrough on a previously-identified and long-standing research stumbling block

List of changes

- clarified axial charge convention; added Table 4 to specify multiplets read off from brane intersections
- improved presentation of Abelian N=3 Chern-Simons matter theories sections
- added new sections on non-Abelian N=3 Chern-Simons matter theories
- added Figure 23 to explain the strategy for deriving magnetic quivers for each maximal branch in N=3 theories
- revised and expanded introduction, to emphasise motivation
- fixed typos

Current status:
Accepted in target Journal

Editorial decision: For Journal SciPost Physics: Publish
(status: Editorial decision fixed and (if required) accepted by authors)


Reports on this Submission

Report #3 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2025-4-27 (Invited Report)

Report

The authors have satisfactorily addressed the questions and corrected the points raised in my previous review. Furthermore, following other reviewers's insight, they have clarified parts of the presentation and extended their analysis of $\mathcal{N}=3$ cases with non-Abelian examples, which appear to be both correct and novel.
As a side comment, the newly added find Table 4 very neat. It is certainly true that the previous conventions did not alter the final results, but I believe the current version using the most common convention for hypers vs twisted hypers will be of easier access for the readers.

Overall I consider the paper worth publishing in SciPost Physics in the current version.

Recommendation

Publish (easily meets expectations and criteria for this Journal; among top 50%)

  • validity: -
  • significance: -
  • originality: -
  • clarity: -
  • formatting: -
  • grammar: -

Report #2 by Anonymous (Referee 3) on 2025-4-26 (Invited Report)

Report

The authors have addressed the referee's comments satisfactorily. The article deserves publication in the SciPost.

Recommendation

Publish (meets expectations and criteria for this Journal)

  • validity: -
  • significance: -
  • originality: -
  • clarity: -
  • formatting: -
  • grammar: -

Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 2) on 2025-4-25 (Invited Report)

Report

The authors addressed the comments. The paper can be published.

Recommendation

Publish (meets expectations and criteria for this Journal)

  • validity: high
  • significance: good
  • originality: good
  • clarity: high
  • formatting: perfect
  • grammar: excellent

Login to report or comment