SciPost Submission Page
The Bose polaron as thermometer of a trapped Bose gas: a quantum Monte Carlo study
by Tomasz Wasak, Gerard Pascual, Gregory E. Astrakharchik, Jordi Boronat, Antonio Negretti
Submission summary
| Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Jordi Boronat · Gerard Pascual · Tomasz Wasak |
| Submission information | |
|---|---|
| Preprint Link: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.04553v1 (pdf) |
| Date submitted: | March 7, 2025, 12:49 p.m. |
| Submitted by: | Wasak, Tomasz |
| Submitted to: | SciPost Physics |
| Ontological classification | |
|---|---|
| Academic field: | Physics |
| Specialties: |
|
| Approach: | Theoretical |
Abstract
Quantum impurities interacting with quantum environments offer unique insights into many-body systems. Here, we explore the thermometric potential of a neutral impurity immersed in a harmonically trapped bosonic quantum gas below the Bose-Einstein condensation critical temperature $T_c$. Using ab-initio Path Integral Monte Carlo simulations at finite temperatures, we analyze the impurity's sensitivity to temperature changes by exploiting experimentally accessible observables such as its spatial distribution. Our results, covering a temperature range of $-1.1 \leqslant T/T_c \leqslant 0.9$, reveal that the impurity outperforms estimations based on a one-species bath at lower temperatures, achieving relative precision of 3-4\% for 1000 measurement repetitions. While non-zero boson-impurity interaction strength $g_{BI}$ slightly reduces the accuracy, the impurity's performance remains robust, especially in the low-temperature regime $T/T_c \lesssim 0.45$ withing the analyzed interaction strengths $0 \leqslant g_{BI}/g \leqslant 5$, where $g$ is the boson-boson coupling. We confirm that quantum optical models can capture rather well the dependence of the temperature sensor on the impurity-gas interaction. Although our findings are in qualitative agreement with previous studies, our Monte Carlo simulations offer improved precision. We find that the maximum likelihood estimation protocol approaches the precision comparable to the limit set by the Quantum Fisher Information bound. Finally, using the Hellinger distance method, we directly extract the Fisher information and find that, by exploiting the extremum order statistics, impurities far from the trap center are more sensitive to thermal effects than those close to the trap center.
Author indications on fulfilling journal expectations
- Provide a novel and synergetic link between different research areas.
- Open a new pathway in an existing or a new research direction, with clear potential for multi-pronged follow-up work
- Detail a groundbreaking theoretical/experimental/computational discovery
- Present a breakthrough on a previously-identified and long-standing research stumbling block
Current status:
Reports on this Submission
Strengths
1. The paper addresses an important problem in cold-atom physics
2. The results presented in the paper are well-articulated.
Weaknesses
1. The novelty of the presented study is unclear from the discussion in the text.
2. An experimental protocol is not presented.
Report
The paper explores the possibility of measuring the temperature of a Bose gas using a mobile impurity. This is a timely topic because such measurements are challenging with standard techniques, such as time-of-flight, especially at temperatures much lower than the condensation temperature. The findings are clear and presented well. However, a number of issues should be addressed before this paper can be recommended for publication either in SciPost Physics or SciPost Physics Core.
1. The logic of the manuscript seems to follow that of Ref. [23]. In particular, the paper confirms the main results of Ref. [23] and finds "that the actual thermometric performance is better when the Monte Carlo results are exploited". Note however that Ref. [23] considers a one-dimensional system, which complicates the direct comparison. From my point of view, the present study should rather compare to this paper: Physical Review Research 4, 023191 (2022).
2. The manuscript does not explain when the present protocol outperforms other proposals in the field, e.g., Scientific Reports 4, 6436 (2014) Physical Review X 10, 011018 (2020), Eur. Phys. J. C (2023) 83:1022. In general, the first section does not provide a detailed introduction into the field of thermometry. At the very least, the first section should contain references that support the written statements. For example, the text "It is interesting to note, however, that beyond quantum simulation purposes, such as polaron physics and mediated interactions, investigations into exploiting impurities for technological applications, such as sensing devices, have only recently been undertaken." is unclear without references. The same is true for this sentence: "In a recent study, we have shown that the level of miscibility of impurities in a bosonic bath can be controlled by the bath’s temperature.", and a few other sentences in the introduction.
3. The manuscript does not discuss a proof-of-concept experimental protocol to test the presented findings, making it difficult to use them directly in the existing laboratory setups. For example, the impurity and bosons have the same mass in the present study. In the corresponding experiments, the impurity is usually introduced by an RF pulse after the cooling process. The initial distribution of the impurities is then non-thermal, and some waiting time is required for the system to thermalize. If this time is too long then the suggested temperature measurement is probably not optimal.
4. The manuscript repeatedly uses the term 'polaron,' which I believe is misleading in the present context. Indeed, the main results hold even without the impurity-boson interaction, indicating that the dressing of the impurity does not play a significant role. The paper also considers very strong interactions, for which the system is in the immiscible regime where the polaron concept is also inapplicable. It appears that the quasi-particle nature is not relevant to the present study.
5. The manuscript focuses on 100 particles. This number is however too small for state-of-the-art three-dimensional experiments. The manuscript should comment on the applicability of the present results to actual experiments.
Recommendation
Ask for major revision