SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Light sterile neutrinos: a critical overview

by Ivan Esteban

This is not the latest submitted version.

This Submission thread is now published as

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Ivan Esteban
Submission information
Preprint Link: scipost_201810_00001v1  (pdf)
Date submitted: 2018-10-26 02:00
Submitted by: Esteban, Ivan
Submitted to: SciPost Physics Proceedings
Proceedings issue: The 15th International Workshop on Tau Lepton Physics (TAU2018)
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • High-Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Approaches: Experimental, Theoretical

Abstract

Light sterile neutrinos, first proposed after the results of the LSND experiment, have been a polemical topic for the last decades after seemingly contradictory data appeared from different experiments. In this overview, I review the experimental hints that point towards sterile neutrinos as well as their statistical compatibility. Even though the muon neutrino disappearance experiments strongly rule out vanilla sterile neutrinos, each oscillation channel remains internally mostly consistent. In any case, in the near future a series of independent and precise experiments should finally settle down this issue.

Current status:
Has been resubmitted

Reports on this Submission

Anonymous Report 1 on 2018-11-27 (Invited Report)

  • Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:scipost_201810_00001v1, delivered 2018-11-27, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.679

Strengths

This paper gives a superb overview over the hotly debated issue of sterile neutrinos. The author very nicely weights all evidence pro and contra. It is well written and clear.

Weaknesses

None.

Report

This paper gives a superb overview over the hotly debated issue of sterile neutrinos. The author very nicely weights all evidence pro and contra. It is well written and clear. I have one question to figure 7: the first two data points are both labelled GALLEX (51CR L = 1.9m), so what is different between these two points?

Requested changes

One typo on line 171: en -> an

  • validity: top
  • significance: top
  • originality: top
  • clarity: top
  • formatting: excellent
  • grammar: excellent

Author:  Ivan Esteban  on 2018-11-28  [id 361]

(in reply to Report 1 on 2018-11-27)

I gratefully thank the referee for his/her careful reading and comments. Answering the question, in Figure 7 the two GALLEX data points refer to measurements with two different 51Cr sources. The particular references for each measurement are

http://inspirehep.net/record/380797

http://inspirehep.net/record/451948

Login to report or comment