SciPost Submission Page
The Asymptotically Safe Standard Model: From quantum gravity to dynamical chiral symmetry breaking
by Álvaro PastorGutiérrez, Jan M. Pawlowski, Manuel Reichert
This is not the latest submitted version.
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
Authors (as registered SciPost users):  Álvaro Pastor Gutiérrez · Jan M. Pawlowski · Manuel Reichert 
Submission information  

Preprint Link:  scipost_202209_00028v1 (pdf) 
Date submitted:  20220914 14:16 
Submitted by:  Pastor Gutiérrez, Álvaro 
Submitted to:  SciPost Physics 
Ontological classification  

Academic field:  Physics 
Specialties: 

Approaches:  Theoretical, Phenomenological 
Abstract
We present a comprehensive nonperturbative study of the phase structure of the asymptotically safe Standard Model. The physics scales included range from the asymptotically safe transPlanckian regime in the ultraviolet, the intermediate highenergy regime with electroweak symmetry breaking to strongly correlated QCD in the infrared. All flows are computed with a selfconsistent functional renormalisation group approach, using a vertex expansion in the fluctuation fields. In particular, this approach takes care of all physical threshold effects and the respective decoupling of ultraviolet degrees of freedom. Standard Model and gravity couplings and masses are fixed by their experimental low energy values. Importantly, we accommodate for the difference between the top pole mass and its Euclidean analogue. Both, the correct mass determination and the threshold effects have a significant impact on the qualitative properties, and in particular on the stability properties of the specific ultravioletinfrared trajectory with experimental Standard Model physics in the infrared. We show that in the present rather advanced approximation the matter part of the asymptotically safe Standard Model has the same number of relevant parameters as the Standard Model, and is asymptotically free. This result is based on the novel UV fixed point found in the present work: the fixed point Higgs potential is flat but has two relevant directions. These results and their analysis are accompanied by a thorough discussion of the systematic error of the present truncation, also important for systematic improvements.
Current status:
Reports on this Submission
Anonymous Report 2 on 2023221 (Invited Report)
 Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:scipost_202209_00028v1, delivered 20230221, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.6773
Report
The work “The asymptotically safe standard model: from quantum gravity to dynamical chiral symmetry breaking” uses functional renormalization group methods to study the phase space of quantum gravity supplemented by matter degrees of freedom. As its novel feature, all degrees of freedom present in the standard model of particle physics and many of their interactions are included in the study. Notably, the work reports on important, new results along this research line. Specifically,
1) it identifies a new gravitymatter fixed point. The key feature of this fixed point is the structure of the Higgs potential which comes with two relevant directions. This distinguishes the new fixed point from the Gaussian matter fixed point, since it permits the creation of a nontrivial Higgs potential when going towards energies below the Planck scale.
2) the authors make a significant effort in order to construct the UVcritical hypersurfaces of the gravitymatter fixed point. Specifically, a lot of thought has been gone into placing the standard model of particle physics within this setting.
3) as a main result, the authors argue that the standard model of particle physics is located in the UVcritical hypersurface of their new gravity matter fixed point.
An important insight obtained along this analysis is that including a significant number of powercounting irrelevant couplings in the Higgs potential is essential for making the new fixed point visible.
In my opinion, the work constitutes a milestone in the gravitational asymptotic safety program. It certainly fulfills the publication criteria of SciPost Physics and I am happy to recommend the article for publication.
There are some weaker points about this work which I feel should be mentioned in this report. Given the breakthroughnature of the work, it is acceptable to postpone the ultimate clarification of these questions to future work:
1) The derivation of the results builds on a series of approximations. These are necessary in order to make the computation technically feasible. Each of these approximations is explained in reasonable detail and the authors provide arguments suggesting their validity in each case. From the main text, it is then difficult to deduce what is actually done and what the impact of the entire set of approximations actually amounts to. In my opinion having an overview on all approximations and identifications made along the computation (either in diagrammatic or tabulated form) would make the work much more accessible.
2) An important point is the discussion of potential sources of theoretical errors in Section VI, as it highlights the effects which could ultimately affect the conclusions drawn in the work. I have the impression that the quoted errors may ultimately be too stringent with respect to the omission of contributions not considered in the present setting.
Anonymous Report 1 on 202315 (Invited Report)
 Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:scipost_202209_00028v1, delivered 20230105, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.6451
Report
In this paper, the authors present the first results of asymptotically safe gravitymatter systems, including the full standard model in the matter sector. To my knowledge, this is the first selfconsistent FRG calculation of beta functions for the standard model couplings in the presence of gravity. It corresponds to an important milestone in asymptotically safe quantum gravity literature. The main result was the construction of RGtrajectories connecting an asymptotically safe transPlanckian regime with a phenomenologically viable IR regime featuring electroweak SSB and chiral SB in the strong sector of the standard model.
In my opinion, the results presented in this paper are sufficiently relevant and deserve to be published in this journal. However, before I give my full recommendation, I would like to ask the authors to address a few points.
1  The UV completion of the Yukawa sector is quite subtle. In this paper, they achieve the correct sign for UV completion in the Yukawa sector by neglecting one of the diagrams contributing to the flow of the Yukawa couplings. In my opinion, this is not a satisfactory solution for the problem of UV completion in the Yukawa sector. Based on the comments at the beginning of section III.D, the author seems to share a similar opinion. Therefore, I think it would be valuable if they could add a short "roadmap" discussing possible future directions to address the problem of UV completion of Yukawa couplings in a more satisfactory way.
2  If the gravitational contribution to the flow of the abeliangauge and Yukawa couplings comes with a negative sign, we might find a second scenario for UV completion featuring nonvanishing abeliangauge and Yukawa couplings in the fixed point regime. RG trajectories emanating from such a fixed point structure tend to be more "predictive" than trajectories emanating from vanishing matter couplings in the UV. For example, this is the basis for the "prediction" of the topbottom mass difference from asymptotic safety (arXiv: 1803.04027). I would like to know if the authors explored this possibility in their analysis. In particular, would such a scenario be compatible with a phenomenologically viable IR regime? It would be interesting to see a comment about this question in the paper.
3  I am very puzzled by their estimate of systematic uncertainties related to truncation choice. In particular, the authors claim: "we believe that this source of error is subleading, significantly smaller than 1 GeV". From what I understood, this value comes from including higherorder contributions to the anomalous dimensions. But it does not take into account all the remaining higherorder operators that we could add to a truncation. In my opinion, the authors should add a more detailed explanation on how to get to such an estimative, or they should not say that the truncation error is significantly smaller than 1 GeV.
Author: Álvaro Pastor Gutiérrez on 20230317 [id 3491]
(in reply to Report 1 on 20230105)
We thank the referee for their careful work, the detailed report, and the suggestions for improvement. Here are our answers to the remarks of the referee.
1. We agree with the referee that Yukawa sector is quite subtle. In the current approximation, the sign of the gravity contribution to the Yukawa flow is regulator dependent. The sign of the Yukawa flow that leads to a UV fixed point is simulated by a vanishing tadpole contribution. We have discussed in Sec. 3A, how improving the momentum dependences of the flows will stabilize the Yukawa sector. Evidently, this is one of the most pressing issues in the asymptotically safe Standard Model and is subject to current improvements.
The improvements required in the flow of the Yukawa coupling are twofold: The first concerns the momentum dependences of the $n$point correlation functions, in particular, that of the Yukawa coupling itself. The second improvement concerns the interaction terms contributing to the Yukawa flow, for instance, higherorder curvature invariants and form factors such as $R \phi \bar \psi \psi$ and $R f(\Delta) R$. We have included this roadmap discussion in the manuscript.
2. Fixed points with a nonvanishing Yukawa or U(1)gauge coupling are indeed very interesting due to their predictive nature. In our computation, these fixed points exist but do not lead to a viable phenomenology in the IR: they either lead to a toolarge top mass or a toolarge finestructure constant. Our focus was to exactly match the SM in the IR and therefore we do not extensively discuss these solutions in the paper. We have now added a corresponding paragraph.
3. We emphasise this truncation error is the {\it remaining} error, after accounting for the uncertainty on the fixedpoint values, the top mass, and the strong coupling. This remaining error is dominated by the subPlanckian regime and is therefore similar to that of standard perturbation theory. There, the dominant errors stem from the top mass and the strong coupling, and effects from higherloop orders are subleading. In straight analogy, we find these errors are dominating and of the order one GeV. Consequently, we find that the remaining truncation error is smaller than 1 GeV.
We understand that the referee is surprised by this small truncation error. The main reason is that the nonperturbative UV regime is decoupling very quickly with a power law and therefore higherorder operators do not strongly affect this particular result of our work.
We have made the unfortunate choice in the manuscript to discuss the remaining error first. We have now changed the ordering of the error discussion.
Author: Álvaro Pastor Gutiérrez on 20230317 [id 3492]
(in reply to Report 2 on 20230221)We thank the referee for their careful work, the detailed report, the positive feedback, and the suggestions for improvement. Here are our answers to the remarks of the referee.
1 . We thank the referee for this useful suggestion. We have now added an Appendix in which we summarise the approximations.
2 . We agree with the referee that the discussion of the error sources is important for the conclusions of our work. This is precisely why we aimed at a quantitative error estimate. While these errors may seem small considering the complexity of the system, we believe that they provide a fair assessment of uncertainty. We have improved the description of the error sources to further sustain our estimate.