Contributor info: Mr Laurids Jeppe

Laurids Jeppe, on behalf of the CMS collaboration

SciPost Phys. Proc. 18, 020 (2026) · published 29 January 2026 | Toggle abstract · pdf

A search for scalar or pseudoscalar states decaying to a top quark-antiquark pair ($\mathrm{t \bar{t}}$), using $138 \mathrm{ fb}^{-1}$ of pp collision data taken at $\sqrt{s} = 13 \mathrm{ TeV}$ using the CMS detector, is presented. Events with one or two leptons are analyzed using the invariant $\mathrm{t \bar{t}}$ mass ($m_{\mathrm{t \bar{t}}}$) as well as angular and spin correlation observables. An excess in the data is observed for low values of $m_{\mathrm{t \bar{t}}}$, preferring a pseudoscalar over a scalar hypothesis. It is interpreted in terms of a generic model of (pseudo)scalar boson production, as well as a simplified model of a $\mathrm{t \bar{t}}$ bound state ($\eta_{\mathrm{t}}$), yielding good agreement with the data. Moreover, limits on the couplings of additional (pseudo)scalar bosons to top quarks are set.

Alberto Belvedere, Saptaparna Bhattacharya, Giacomo Boldrini, Suman Chatterjee, Alessandro Calandri, Sergio Sánchez Cruz, Jennet Dickinson, Franz J. Glessgen, Reza Goldouzian, Alexander Grohsjean, Laurids Jeppe, Charlotte Knight, Olivier Mattelaer, Kelci Mohrman, Hannah Nelson, Vasilije Perovic, Matteo Presilla, Robert Schoefbeck, Nick Smith

SciPost Phys. Comm. Rep. 4 (2024) · published 29 November 2024 | Toggle abstract · pdf

This note provides a comprehensive overview of tools for predicting observables in the Standard Model effective field theory (SMEFT) at both tree level and one loop using event generators. We evaluate three primary methodologies–event reweighting, separate simulation of squared matrix elements, and full SMEFT process simulation–focusing on their statistical performance, computational efficiency, and potential biases. Each approach is assessed in terms of its accuracy, highlighting trade-offs between precision and resource demands. Practical insights into their applicability for high-energy physics analyses are offered, with particular attention to processes where SMEFT effects are significant. Additionally, we discuss the role of helicity in reweighting strategies and its impact on the quality of predictions. By comparing the methods across various LHC processes, this note provides guidance for selecting the most effective strategy for various SMEFT studies, ensuring robust predictions while optimizing computational resources.