SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Achieving quantum advantage in a search for a violations of the Goldbach conjecture, with driven atoms in tailored potentials

by Oleksandr V. Marchukov, Andrea Trombettoni, Giuseppe Mussardo, Maxim Olshanii

This is not the latest submitted version.

This Submission thread is now published as

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Maxim Olshanii
Submission information
Preprint Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.00517v4  (pdf)
Date submitted: Sept. 23, 2025, 4:24 a.m.
Submitted by: Maxim Olshanii
Submitted to: SciPost Physics Core
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics - Theory
Approach: Theoretical

Abstract

The famous Goldbach conjecture states that any even natural number $N$ greater than $2$ can be written as the sum of two prime numbers $p^{\text{(I)}}$ and $p^{\text{(II)}}$. In this article we propose a quantum analogue device that solves the following problem: given a small prime $p^{\text{(I)}}$, identify a member $N$ of a $\mathcal{N}$-strong set even numbers for which $N-p^{\text{(I)}}$ is also a prime. A table of suitable large primes $p^{\text{(II)}}$ is assumed to be known a priori. The device realizes the Grover quantum search protocol and as such ensures a $\sqrt{\mathcal{N}}$ quantum advantage. Our numerical example involves a set of 51 even numbers just above the highest even classical-numerically explored so far [T. O. e Silva, S. Herzog, and S. Pardi, Mathematics of Computation {\bf 83}, 2033 (2013)]. For a given small prime number $p^{\text{(I)}}=223$, it took our quantum algorithm 5 steps to identify the number $N=4\times 10^{18}+14$ as featuring a Goldbach partition involving $223$ and another prime, namely $p^{\text{(II)}}=4\times 10^{18}-239$. Currently, our algorithm limits the number of evens to be tested simultaneously to $\mathcal{N} \sim \ln(N)$: larger samples will typically contain more than one even that can be partitioned with the help of a given $p^{\text{(I)}}$, thus leading to a departure from the Grover paradigm.

Author comments upon resubmission

To start let us mention that without the referees, this paper would be two time shorter. Their comments were relevant, focused, and inspiring.

List of changes

We added several sentences of a comment, in the end of the Section 2.5. Additionally, we completely eliminated the misleading notion of "perturbation."

We expanded the Chapter 3 to better describe our numerical results.

We added two small paragraphs to the ens of the Chapter 3.
Current status:
Has been resubmitted

Login to report or comment