The CPT theorem states that a unitary and Lorentz-invariant theory must also be invariant under a discrete symmetry $\mathbf{CRT}$ which reverses charge, time, and one spatial direction. In this article, we study a $\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetry group, in which two of the nontrivial symmetries (``Reflection Reality'' and a 180 degree rotation) are implied by Unitarity and Lorentz Invariance respectively, while the third is $\mathbf{CRT}$. (In cosmology, Scale Invariance plays the role of Lorentz Invariance.) This naturally leads to converses of the CPT theorem, as any two of the discrete $\mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetries will imply the third one. Furthermore, in many field theories, the Reflection Reality $\mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetry is actually sufficient to imply the theory is fully unitary, over a generic range of couplings. Building upon previous work on the Cosmological Optical Theorem, we derive non-perturbative reality conditions associated with bulk Reflection Reality (in all flat FLRW models) and $\mathbf{CRT}$ (in de Sitter spacetime), in arbitrary dimensions. Remarkably, this $\mathbf{CRT}$ constraint suffices to fix the phase of all wavefunction coefficients at future infinity (up to a real sign) -- without requiring any analytic continuation, or comparison to past infinity -- although extra care is required in cases where the bulk theory has logarithmic UV or IR divergences. This result has significant implications for de Sitter holography, as it allows us to determine the phases of arbitrary $n$-point functions in the dual CFT.
Author indications on fulfilling journal expectations
Provide a novel and synergetic link between different research areas.
Open a new pathway in an existing or a new research direction, with clear potential for multi-pronged follow-up work
Detail a groundbreaking theoretical/experimental/computational discovery
Present a breakthrough on a previously-identified and long-standing research stumbling block
Author comments upon resubmission
Made changes in response to comments by referees 1 and 2. See version 3 on arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.17406.
List of changes
List of changes in responses to referee points.
Current status:
In refereeing
Reports on this Submission
Report #1 by
Anonymous
(Referee 1) on 2026-1-7
(Invited Report)
Report
I think that the authors have satisfactorily addressed all my previous questions. I am happy to recommend the current version for publication.
Recommendation
Publish (easily meets expectations and criteria for this Journal; among top 50%)