SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Magnetic moment of electrons in systems with spin-orbit coupling

by Ivan A. Ado, M. Titov, Rembert A. Duine, Arne Brataas

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Ivan A. Ado
Submission information
Preprint Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.10956v3  (pdf)
Date submitted: Dec. 18, 2025, 7:25 p.m.
Submitted by: Ivan A. Ado
Submitted to: SciPost Physics
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • Condensed Matter Physics - Theory
Approach: Theoretical

Abstract

Magnetic effects originating from spin-orbit coupling (SOC) have been attracting major attention. However, SOC contributions to the electron magnetic moment operator are conventionally disregarded. In this work, we analyze relativistic contributions to the latter operator, including those of the SOC-type: in vacuum, for the semiconductor 8 band Kane model, and for an arbitrary system with two spectral branches. In this endeavor, we introduce a notion of relativistic corrections to the operation $\partial/\partial\boldsymbol B$, where $\boldsymbol B$ is an external magnetic field. We highlight the difference between the magnetic moment and $-\partial H/\partial\boldsymbol B$, where $H$ is the system Hamiltonian. We suggest to call this difference the abnormal magnetic moment. We demonstrate that the conventional decomposition of the total magnetic moment into the spin and orbital parts becomes ambiguous when relativistic corrections are taken into account. The latter also jeopardize the "modern theory of orbital magnetization" in its standard formulation. We derive a linear response Kubo formula for the kinetic magnetoelectric effect projected to individual branches of a two branch system. This allows us, in particular, to identify a source of this effect that stems from noncommutation of the position and $\partial/\partial\boldsymbol B$ operators' components. This is an analog of the contribution to the Hall conductivity from noncommuting components of the position operator. We comment on the relation between such contributions and the Berry curvature theory. We also report several additional observations related to the electron magnetic moment operator in systems with SOC and other relativistic corrections.

Author indications on fulfilling journal expectations

  • Provide a novel and synergetic link between different research areas.
  • Open a new pathway in an existing or a new research direction, with clear potential for multi-pronged follow-up work
  • Detail a groundbreaking theoretical/experimental/computational discovery
  • Present a breakthrough on a previously-identified and long-standing research stumbling block

List of changes

We added two new Sections, 4.4 and 4.5, in which we discuss how our results relate to the Berry curvature theory and to the computation of the magnetoelectric effect from the current-current correlator. We cited and commented on the previous works that considered the relation between the relativistic spin and orbital angular momentum operators and their alternative definitions. We emphasized that the magnetic moment operator, in general, indeed depends on the magnetic field. We explained why the vacuum relativistic corrections can be disregarded (in our case) when the spin magnetic moment is expressed using the exchange field. We expanded the introduction to Section 4 in order to clarify its main messages. We added several relevant References to the Bibliography.
Current status:
In refereeing

Reports on this Submission

Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2026-1-9 (Invited Report)

Strengths

The manuscript addresses an interesting topic, the definition of the magnetic moment in the relativistic case. The authors propose a definition through the derivative of the Dirac Hamiltonian with respect to the external magnetic field B.
The authors point out that there are differences between what they call a "naive" magnetic moment and their final result, given in Eq. (15)

Weaknesses

Since I have seen the manuscript before, and have already given my comments, I think that the manuscript should now be published.
One point still needs attention from the authors:
they define the Bohr magneton with a 1/c , which is usually not done. This then makes several terms in their Hamiltonian (7) to have 1/c^3 order, but others have 1/c^2 order.

Report

The acceptance criteria are met; the point below should be checked by the authors.

Requested changes

The definition of the Bohr magneton is unusual - the authors should check this, as it affects what order in 1/c terms in the transformed Hamiltonian have.

Recommendation

Ask for minor revision

  • validity: good
  • significance: good
  • originality: good
  • clarity: ok
  • formatting: good
  • grammar: excellent

Login to report or comment