SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Polarization-Sensitive Imaging in Magnetic Environments

by Nejc Blaznik, Dries van Oosten, Peter van der Straten

This Submission thread is now published as

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Peter van der Straten
Submission information
Preprint Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.17474v2  (pdf)
Data repository: https://doi.org/10.24416/UU01-Q36JBA
Date accepted: Oct. 6, 2025
Date submitted: Sept. 11, 2025, 10:04 a.m.
Submitted by: Peter van der Straten
Submitted to: SciPost Physics Core
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics - Experiment
  • Condensed Matter Physics - Experiment
Approach: Experimental

Abstract

Nondestructive spin-resolved imaging of ultracold atomic gases requires calculating the differences of the refractive indices seen by two circular probe polarizations. Perfect overlap of the two images, corresponding to two different polarizations, is required well below the feature size of interest. In this paper, we demonstrate that the birefringence of atoms in magnetic field gradients results in polarization-dependent aberrations in the image, which deteriorates the overlap. To that end, we develop a model that couples atomic tensor polarizability with position-dependent spin orientation and yields aberration predictions for accumulated phase shifts in arbitrary field geometries. Applied to data from an ultra-cold atomic cloud trapped in a Ioffe-Pritchard trap, the model quantitatively reproduces the observed distortion across a range of temperatures. A residual offset of $\sim1\;\mu\mathrm{m}$ remains even under uniform field conditions, likely due to optical asymmetries. For images obtained through off-axis holography, the full complex field of the probe enables post-processing removal of all magnetically induced aberrations through a single numerically calculated Fourier-space phase mask.

Author comments upon resubmission

Dear Editor,

We have carefully read the reports by the referees. We are pleased that the referee reports have been positive and agree with their suggestions. We have implemented the changes, as indicated in our response to the referees. We also included a manuscript highlighting the changes, where the corrections are indicated in red and the added sections can be seen in blue.

On behalf of the authors, Peter van der Straten

List of changes

See the manuscript uploaded together with our rebuttal to the referees. The changes are indicated in red, whereas the added sections are indicated in blue.

Published as SciPost Phys. Core 8, 076 (2025)


Reports on this Submission

Report #2 by Anonymous (Referee 2) on 2025-9-19 (Invited Report)

Report

The authors have made the requested changes. I support publication of the manuscript.

Recommendation

Publish (easily meets expectations and criteria for this Journal; among top 50%)

  • validity: -
  • significance: -
  • originality: -
  • clarity: -
  • formatting: -
  • grammar: -

Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2025-9-15 (Invited Report)

Report

The authors have answered my questions to an appropriate degree, and I recommend publications.

Recommendation

Publish (easily meets expectations and criteria for this Journal; among top 50%)

  • validity: top
  • significance: good
  • originality: good
  • clarity: top
  • formatting: excellent
  • grammar: excellent

Login to report or comment