SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Particle Identification with MLPs and PINNs Using HADES Data

by Marvin Kohls

This is not the latest submitted version.

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Marvin Kohls
Submission information
Preprint Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.17685v1  (pdf)
Date submitted: Sept. 23, 2025, 8:19 a.m.
Submitted by: Marvin Kohls
Submitted to: SciPost Physics Proceedings
Proceedings issue: The 2nd European AI for Fundamental Physics Conference (EuCAIFCon2025)
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • Nuclear Physics - Experiment
Approach: Computational
Disclosure of Generative AI use

The author(s) disclose that the following generative AI tools have been used in the preparation of this submission:

Spelling and grammar corrections

Abstract

In experimental nuclear and particle physics, the extraction of high-purity samples of rare events critically depends on the efficiency and accuracy of particle identification (PID). In this work, we present a PID method applied to HADES data at the level of fully reconstructed particle track candidates. The results demonstrate a significant improvement in PID performance compared to conventional techniques, highlighting the potential of physics-informed neural networks as a powerful tool for future data analyses.

Current status:
Has been resubmitted

Reports on this Submission

Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2025-11-10 (Invited Report)

Strengths

The paper is well written and easy to follows. It introduce an application of Domain-Adversarial Neural Network (DANNs) with an additional Physics-Informed loss for training on simulated data (and unlabelled real data) a neural network for Particle identification at HADES.

Report

The paper deserves publication.
Just as a minor comment, which can be easily justified by the page limit: the full form of the Bethe-Bloch physics-informed loss have not been explicitly stated. The Author may consider adding a few details about it, if it fits in the page limits.

Recommendation

Publish (meets expectations and criteria for this Journal)

  • validity: good
  • significance: good
  • originality: good
  • clarity: good
  • formatting: good
  • grammar: excellent

Login to report or comment