SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Mechanical work extraction from an error-prone active dynamic Szilard engine

by Luca Cocconi, Paolo Malgaretti, Holger Stark

This is not the latest submitted version.

This Submission thread is now published as

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Luca Cocconi · Paolo Malgaretti
Submission information
Preprint Link: scipost_202505_00051v2  (pdf)
Date submitted: Sept. 3, 2025, 4:32 p.m.
Submitted by: Luca Cocconi
Submitted to: SciPost Physics
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • Statistical and Soft Matter Physics
  • Active Matter
Approach: Theoretical

Abstract

Isothermal information engines operate by extracting net work from a single heat bath through measurement and feedback control. In this work, we analyze a realistic active Szilard engine operating on a single self-propelled particle by means of steric interaction with an externally controlled mechanical element. In particular, we provide a comprehensive study of how finite measurement accuracy affects the engine's work and power output, as well as the cost of operation. Having established the existence of non-trivial optima for work and power output, we study the dependence of their loci on the measurement error parameters and identify conditions for their positivity under one-shot and cyclic engine operation. We also demonstrate that a suitably defined efficiency of information-to-work conversion, which at equilibrium is bounded above by unity as a consequence of Landauer's principle, may here be made arbitrarily large by increasing the active Péclet number of the particle. Notably, the information efficiency for one-shot operation exhibits a discontinuous transition and a non-monotonic dependence on the measurement precision. Finally, we show that cyclic operation improves information efficiency by harvesting residual mutual information between successive measurements.

Author indications on fulfilling journal expectations

  • Provide a novel and synergetic link between different research areas.
  • Open a new pathway in an existing or a new research direction, with clear potential for multi-pronged follow-up work
  • Detail a groundbreaking theoretical/experimental/computational discovery
  • Present a breakthrough on a previously-identified and long-standing research stumbling block

Author comments upon resubmission

We thank the referees and the editor for the effort and time they spent assessing our work. Their comments have helped us improve further our manuscript and we are hopeful that it may now be suitable for publication in SciPost Physics. We note that the main concerns raised by the three referees were of a conceptual nature, specifically with regards to physical motivation and interpretation of our results in light of general thermodynamic principles. Alongside some adjustments to notation and mathematical derivations (particularly in Sec.4.2), we have therefore focussed in our revision on clarifying these important conceptual points. Detailed responses to the individual reports are provided as comments to the original submission.

List of changes

Main changes: - Expanded discussion on physical motivation in the introduction - Clarify link between Landauer bound and the second law of thermodynamics out of equilibrium - Added a table of key parameters (Appendix A) and provided reference values (footnote 2) motivating our focus on the high Péclet regime - Added discussion of positional noise for particle-piston encounter dynamics - Added discussion of delay in piston placement - Revised Sec.4.2 to give a more general argument in support of the approximations applied there

Current status:
Has been resubmitted

Reports on this Submission

Report #2 by Klaus Kroy (Referee 1) on 2025-10-10 (Invited Report)

  • Cite as: Klaus Kroy, Report on arXiv:scipost_202505_00051v2, delivered 2025-10-09, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.12097

Report

The authors have revised and improved their manuscript in order to take into account the referees' suggestions, which makes it more suitable for publication. That said, I still think that the choice of the authors to wonder about the somewhat odd consequences of their own (in my view unfortunate) definition/normalization of the information efficiency is deplorable. I feel that it goes somewhat against the the spirit of thermodynamics and seems prone to promoting future misunderstandings of the sort that we have seen, recently, in the field of active heat engines -- like proclamations of even better information efficiencies obtained with the help of time tables for train departures (at least outside of Germany), say. While I do NOT insist on any further changes, I want to mention that, in place of statements like "We also demonstrate that a suitably defined efficiency of information-to-work conversion, which at equilibrium is bounded above by unity as a consequence of Landauer’s principle, may here be made arbitrarily large by increasing the active Péclet number of the particle" in the abstract, I would have preferred something of the sort "We also demonstrate that an appropriate technical definition of the efficiency of information-to-work conversion, which is bounded by unity via Landauer’s principle, has to account for the athermal motion of the bath particles".

Recommendation

Publish (meets expectations and criteria for this Journal)

  • validity: -
  • significance: -
  • originality: -
  • clarity: -
  • formatting: -
  • grammar: -

Author:  Luca Cocconi  on 2025-10-27  [id 5954]

(in reply to Report 2 by Klaus Kroy on 2025-10-10)
Category:
remark

We have included an additional sentence in the abstract to address this concern. In particular, it is now mentioned explicitly that for a nonequilibrium information efficiency to be bounded above by unity one would need to account for nonthermal motion of the bath particles as an operational cost. Having said this, we find our definition of efficiency (work extracted over operational cost of measurement by an observed interacting with the active bath) physically meaningful and sufficiently motivated in the manuscript.

Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 3) on 2025-9-27 (Invited Report)

Report

The authors have responded appropriately to all of the comments and suggestions, and I consider this manuscript suitable for publication in SciPost.

Recommendation

Publish (easily meets expectations and criteria for this Journal; among top 50%)

  • validity: high
  • significance: high
  • originality: high
  • clarity: high
  • formatting: excellent
  • grammar: perfect

Login to report or comment