SciPost Submission Page
Gapped Phases in (2+1)d with Non-Invertible Symmetries: Part I
by Lakshya Bhardwaj, Daniel Pajer, Sakura Schäfer-Nameki, Apoorv Tiwari, Alison Warman, Jingxiang Wu
Submission summary
| Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Daniel Pajer · Sakura Schäfer-Nameki · Alison Warman · Jingxiang Wu |
| Submission information | |
|---|---|
| Preprint Link: | scipost_202506_00048v1 (pdf) |
| Date accepted: | July 28, 2025 |
| Date submitted: | June 25, 2025, 8:46 a.m. |
| Submitted by: | Jingxiang Wu |
| Submitted to: | SciPost Physics |
| Ontological classification | |
|---|---|
| Academic field: | Physics |
| Specialties: |
|
| Approach: | Theoretical |
Abstract
We use the Symmetry Topological Field Theory (SymTFT) to study and classify gapped phases in (2+1)d for a class of categorical symmetries, referred to as being of bosonic type. The SymTFTs for these symmetries are given by twisted and untwisted (3+1)d Dijkgraaf-Witten (DW) theories for finite groups G. A finite set of boundary conditions (BCs) of these DW theories is well-known: these simply involve imposing Dirichlet and Neumann conditions on the (3+1)d gauge fields. We refer to these as minimal BCs. The key new observation here is that for each DW theory, there exists an infinite number of other BCs, that we call non-minimal BCs. These non-minimal BCs are all obtained by a 'theta construction', which involves stacking the Dirichlet BC with 3d TFTs having G 0-form symmetry, and gauging the diagonal G symmetry. On the one hand, using the non-minimal BCs as symmetry BCs gives rise to an infinite number of non-invertible symmetries having the same SymTFT, while on the other hand, using the non-minimal BCs as physical BCs in the sandwich construction gives rise to an infinite number of (2+1)d gapped phases for each such non-invertible symmetry. Our analysis is thoroughly exemplified for G = $\mathbb{Z_2}$ and more generally any finite abelian group, for which the resulting non-invertible symmetries and their gapped phases already reveal an immensely rich structure.
Author indications on fulfilling journal expectations
- Provide a novel and synergetic link between different research areas.
- Open a new pathway in an existing or a new research direction, with clear potential for multi-pronged follow-up work
- Detail a groundbreaking theoretical/experimental/computational discovery
- Present a breakthrough on a previously-identified and long-standing research stumbling block
Published as SciPost Phys. 19, 056 (2025)
Reports on this Submission
Report #2 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2025-7-14 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:scipost_202506_00048v1, delivered 2025-07-14, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.11568
Report
Recommendation
Publish (meets expectations and criteria for this Journal)
Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 2) on 2025-7-13 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:scipost_202506_00048v1, delivered 2025-07-13, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.11558
Strengths
2-The treatment is very explicit.
3-Many concrete examples are provided.
Weaknesses
2-The content of section 3 is by now quite standard, both in the Math and Physics literatures.
3-The preprint is still quite long.
Report
Requested changes
Most of my comments have been satisfactorily addressed. That being saud, my opinion remains that this preprint is on the lengthier side. I also wish to clarify one of my comments:
- I believe that the categories on page 53 have also been extensively analyzed by Delcamp-Tiwari (arXiv:2301.01259) and Decoppet-Yu (arXiv:2306.08117).
Recommendation
Publish (meets expectations and criteria for this Journal)
