SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Regge Limit of One-Loop String Amplitudes

by Pinaki Banerjee, Lorenz Eberhardt, Sebastian Mizera

This Submission thread is now published as

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Pinaki Banerjee · Lorenz Eberhardt · Sebastian Mizera
Submission information
Preprint Link: scipost_202507_00011v1  (pdf)
Date accepted: July 30, 2025
Date submitted: July 2, 2025, 8:33 p.m.
Submitted by: Sebastian Mizera
Submitted to: SciPost Physics
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • High-Energy Physics - Theory
Approach: Theoretical

Abstract

We study the high-energy limit of $2 \to 2$ one-loop string amplitudes at fixed momentum transfer. For the closed string, the high-energy behavior of the amplitudes can be determined from Regge theory just like in field theory, as was first discussed by Amati, Ciafaloni and Veneziano. However, field theory intuition partially breaks down for the open-string amplitude, where amplitudes can exhibit surprising asymptotics in the high-energy limit depending on the topology of the diagram. We call this phenomenon Regge attenuation. We extract Regge limits by a combination of unitarity cuts and saddle-point analysis. We show that the leading contribution of the planar open-string amplitude is sufficiently simple that we can extract it at any loop order. This allows us to resum the genus expansion in a certain limit and demonstrate that the leading Regge trajectory remains linear in that limit.

Author indications on fulfilling journal expectations

  • Provide a novel and synergetic link between different research areas.
  • Open a new pathway in an existing or a new research direction, with clear potential for multi-pronged follow-up work
  • Detail a groundbreaking theoretical/experimental/computational discovery
  • Present a breakthrough on a previously-identified and long-standing research stumbling block

Author comments upon resubmission

We would like to thank the referee for their thorough reading of our paper and constructive criticism. The main change requested is to clarify the physical interpretation of the results. To summarize the issue, our results can be interpreted in two ways:

I) At each order in perturbation theory, one studies the scattering amplitude on the real axis of the center-of-mass energy squared $s$. The amplitude has an infinite sequence of poles corresponding to string resonances, whose degrees grow with the loop level. After resumming over all the loop orders, resonances acquire mass shifts and decay widths, which shift the poles to the lower half-plane. Accordingly, the large-$s$ asymptotics of the amplitude at a fixed loop order might be very different from that of the resummed amplitude.

II) A posteriori, anticipating the results of I), one can study the behavior of the scattering amplitude right above the real axis in the complex plane of $s$ even at a fixed order in perturbation theory. The precise direction in the complex plane is once again fixed by the asymptotics of the decay widths. Studying the asymptotic behavior slightly in the upper half-plane can be very different from that along the real axis.

Ultimately, both interpretations are equally valid. The analogy in field theory would be I) resumming 1PI diagrams whose effect is to shift the pole masses and II) adjusting pole masses to be complex at each finite loop order.

In the original submission, we opted for the interpretation I and mentioned II only in passing. According to the referee, II is the only correct interpretation and I is misleading. While we disagree with this point of view, we acknowledge that we have previously not provided a thorough discussion of this issue. In the revised version, we made changes that emphasize both interpretations I and I as outlined below.

We would like to once again thank the referee for their valuable feedback which has contributed to improving the presentation of our results.

List of changes

To minimize any potential confusion, we decided to address the above issue already in the introduction. We added headings to different paragraphs and wrote the new one called "Physical interpretation". Its content is the same as the explanations given above. We also included the new Figure 3 to illustrate the idea, an example, and pointers to the literature.

We made a number of other minor fixes to grammar and presentation throughout the paper.

Published as SciPost Phys. 19, 052 (2025)


Reports on this Submission

Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 2) on 2025-7-24 (Invited Report)

Strengths

I found this to be a good paper, clearly articulating the essential points about the Regge limit in string theory.

Weaknesses

None.

Report

This a nice paper, which I am happy to recommend it for publicaiton.

Recommendation

Publish (easily meets expectations and criteria for this Journal; among top 50%)

  • validity: -
  • significance: -
  • originality: -
  • clarity: -
  • formatting: -
  • grammar: -

Login to report or comment