SciPost Submission Page
Superconductivity enhancement and particle-hole asymmetry: interplay with electron attraction in doped Hubbard model
by Zhi Xu, Hong-Chen Jiang, Yi-Fan Jiang
This is not the latest submitted version.
Submission summary
| Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Yi-Fan Jiang |
| Submission information | |
|---|---|
| Preprint Link: | scipost_202508_00079v1 (pdf) |
| Code repository: | https://github.com/JiangYF-phys/U1code |
| Date submitted: | Aug. 31, 2025, 4:40 p.m. |
| Submitted by: | Yi-Fan Jiang |
| Submitted to: | SciPost Physics |
| Ontological classification | |
|---|---|
| Academic field: | Physics |
| Specialties: |
|
| Approach: | Computational |
Abstract
The role of near-neighbor electron attraction $V$ in strongly correlated systems has been at the forefront of recent research of unconventional superconductivity. However, its implications in the doped Hubbard model on expansive systems remain predominantly unexplored. In this study, we employ the density-matrix renormalization group to examine its effect in the lightly doped $t$-$t'$-Hubbard model on six-leg square cylinders, where $t$ and $t'$ are the first and second neighbor electron hopping amplitudes. In the electron-doped regime ($t'>0$), we find that attractive $V$ can substantially enhance superconducting correlations, driving the system into a pronounced superconducting phase when the attraction exceeds a modest value $V_c \approx 0.5t$. In contrast, in the hole-doped regime ($t' <0$), while heightened superconducting correlations have also been observed in the charge stripe phase, the systems remain insulating with pronounced charge density wave order. Our results demonstrate the importance of the electron attraction in boosting superconductivity in broader doped Hubbard systems and highlight the asymmetry between the electron and hole-doped regimes.
Author indications on fulfilling journal expectations
- Provide a novel and synergetic link between different research areas.
- Open a new pathway in an existing or a new research direction, with clear potential for multi-pronged follow-up work
- Detail a groundbreaking theoretical/experimental/computational discovery
- Present a breakthrough on a previously-identified and long-standing research stumbling block
Current status:
Reports on this Submission
Report #2 by Anonymous (Referee 2) on 2025-10-5 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:scipost_202508_00079v1, delivered 2025-10-05, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.12067
Strengths
1- interesting finding that electron and hole-doped sides of the high-Tc Hubbard SC react very differently to the addition of a NN attractive interaction
Weaknesses
1- more data points would be needed on the hole-doped side (now only V=0 and V=0.6 t are shown) to make a truly convincing case.
Report
Requested changes
1- The authors should show more data for the hole-doped side, t'<0. Currently, only one set of results at V=0.6 t is shown, which (although impressive) in my view is not sufficient to make a really strong case. On the electron-doped side the authors scan V=0, 0.2 t, 0.4 t, ... 1.0 t in Fig. 2, and one keeps wondering why they didn't perform a similar analysis on the hole-doped side. I understand that in the Wigner crystal phase they cannot extract Luttinger exponents, but it would be interesting to show e.g. how the magnitude of the SC amplitude itself (at a certain distance, say) changes with V. It would also be interesting to see whether some response can be found before V exceeds 1.0 t, or if even larger values of V would be needed (eventually I assume the system should also become superconducting on the hole-doped side?).
2- it would be good to show some convergence data of the overall density profile. The oscillations in Fig. 2 appear well converged, but it is unclear what quantity exactly the authors plotted: is <n(x)> summed over all legs y? Can the authors directly show <n(x,y)> in the supplements, to give a better idea how well the data is converged?
Recommendation
Publish (surpasses expectations and criteria for this Journal; among top 10%)
Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2025-9-30 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:scipost_202508_00079v1, delivered 2025-09-30, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.12029
Weaknesses
Report
Recommendation
Publish (meets expectations and criteria for this Journal)
