SciPost Submission Page
Sigma Models on Flags
by Kantaro Ohmori, Nathan Seiberg, ShuHeng Shao
This is not the latest submitted version.
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
Authors (as registered SciPost users):  Nathan Seiberg · ShuHeng Shao 
Submission information  

Preprint Link:  https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.10604v2 (pdf) 
Date submitted:  20181025 02:00 
Submitted by:  Shao, ShuHeng 
Submitted to:  SciPost Physics 
Ontological classification  

Academic field:  Physics 
Specialties: 

Approach:  Theoretical 
Abstract
We study (1+1)dimensional nonlinear sigma models, whose target space is the flag manifold $U(N)\over U(N_1)\times U(N_2)\cdots U(N_m)$. These generalize the wellknown $\mathbb{CP}^{N1}$ model. The general flag model exhibits several new elements that are not present in the special case of the $\mathbb{CP}^{N1}$ model. It depends on more parameters, its global symmetry can be larger, and its 't Hooft anomalies can be more subtle. Our discussion based on symmetry and anomaly suggests that for certain choices of the integers $N_I$ and for specific values of the parameters the model is gapless in the IR and is described by an $SU(N)_1$ WZW model. Some of the techniques we present can also be applied to other cases.
Current status:
Reports on this Submission
Report 2 by Sunil Mukhi on 201919 (Invited Report)
 Cite as: Sunil Mukhi, Report on arXiv:1809.10604v2, delivered 20190109, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.784
Strengths
1. Studies a novel family of 2d QFT’s that generalise the wellknown and interesting $CP^1$ sigma model. However they are a different class of generalisations from the more obvious $CP^N$ sigma models, so $CP^1$ lies at the intersection of these two families (as well as other families like $O(N)$ with very different behaviour)
2. The new family studied here has multiple parameters, unlike $CP^N$ where there is a single parameter, the size of the manifold plus a theta angle. Thus richer physical effects can be identified.
3. Restricting to what the authors call the “extreme” case and imposing a discrete $Z_N$ symmetry, one finds mixed anomalies indicative of a nontrivial IR fixed point, which is argued to be an $SU(N)_1$ WZW model.
4. The authors set up a nice flow diagram between the UV of the WZW model, the UV of the flag manifold model and the IR theory of both cases (which is the WZW CFT). This illustrates in particular that the CFT can be reached without fine tuning if one is in the basin of attraction.
Weaknesses
No particular weaknesses
Report
An interesting paper that generalises some previous results on the IR limit of a family of bosonic nonlinear sigma models, presenting a carefully reasoned analysis of the possibilities. A supersymmetric generalisation is also discussed.
Requested changes
1. On page 6, “flat manifold” should be “flag manifold”?
2. This could just be my own confusion, and is anyway rather off the main point of the paper, but the last sentence in footnote 5 puzzled me. While considering the $S_N$ invariant theory and the possibility that its UV symmetry decouples in the IR, the authors acknowledge that it might, in principle, flow to a CFT without any relevant deformation  for example $E_{8,1}$. Then they invoke modular invariance to rule out this possibility for $c<8$ $(N <4)$. So far, so good. However then they go on to say “It is reasonable that the same conclusion is true for all $N$”. But why is that reasonable? The argument for $c<8$ certainly doesn't generalise to $c>8$, where we know many relatively simple CFT's that have no marginal deformations.
Report 1 by Paul Fendley on 2018127 (Invited Report)
 Cite as: Paul Fendley, Report on arXiv:1809.10604v2, delivered 20181207, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.713
Strengths
1) This paper discusses in great depth and clarity sigma models on flag manifolds $SU(N)/U(1)^{N1}$, including topological ``theta’’ angles, whose applications are famous both in particle and condensedmatter theory.
2) The most exciting result of the analysis are the compelling arguments that there exist regions of couplings and theta angles where the flow is to a critical theory, the $SU(N)_1$ WessZuminoWitten conformal field theory. This generalises the famous Haldane/Affleck result for N=2 at theta=pi and recent work by Lajko et al arXiv:1706.06598 for the N=3 case.
3) Since there are lattice models realising these field theories, this result greatly generalises the Haldane ``conjecture’’.
Weaknesses
Aren't really any
Report
It’s hard to imagine getting any further using this type of direct analysis than the authors already did. Thus I believe it should be published in SciPost.
Given that this forum is public, it seems appropriate to share a few thoughts on extending these results. The Haldane conjecture has been so well established by now it shouldn’t be called a conjecture, but these new results still are conjectures. So one very interesting direction to purse further would be to provide further evidence for them. My bias would be toward finding integrable models exhibiting these flows, the same way the Zamolodchikovs did for the flow in $CP^1$ at $\theta=\pi$ to $SU(2)_1$ (i.e. the Haldane case). Moreover, this would be interesting in its own right: I don’t know any integrable sigma models not on symmetric spaces or deformations of them (like the sausage model), at least for compact manifolds.
One strategy in finding such integrable models would be to exploit symmetries and (putative) integrability to guess the corresponding scattering matrix in the Zamoldchikov style. I showed long ago that this strategy works for the $SU(N)/SO(N)$ models at $\theta=\pi$ discussed in an appendix, and so might bear fruit in the flagmanifold case. A complementary strategy is to explore the connection with the homogenous sineGordon models analysed in a series of papers 1520 years ago, culminating in a paper by Dorey and Miramontes in arXiv:hepth/0405275. These models are integrable deformations of coset CFTs $G_k/U(1)^{rank(G)}$, known as Gepner parafermions. It has long been known due to work by Fateev and Al Zamolodchikov, generalised in an old paper arXiv:hepth/9906036 of mine, that taking the $k,k’\to\infty$ limit of certain deformations of $G_k/H_{k’}$ coset models gives the sigma model $G/H$. Perhaps the same construction will work here.
Requested changes
1) The strategy the authors use (analyse symmetries of the action, then see if these are enough to forbid all relevant perturbations for the putative IR fixed point) in this context is mainly due to Ian Affleck. One particular paper of his most closely related to the strategy here, in particular the role of the $\mathbb{Z}_n$ in $SU(N)_1$, is Nucl. Phys. B305 (1988) 582. Thus a reference in the introduction to this paper (in addition to his others already there) would probably be a good idea. His Les Houches lectures from that year also provide a superb introduction to the topic.
2) in several places $PSU(N)=PSU(N)/\mathbb{Z}_n$ is written. Presumably what is meant is $PSU(N)=SU(N)/\mathbb{Z}_n$ ??
3) Since the bulk of the paper is on $SU(N)/U(1)^{N1}$ (and then $U(N)/U(M)^r$), probably this should be mentioned in the abstraction in addition to the general case.