SciPost Submission Page
If the Weak Were Strong and the Strong Were Weak
by Nakarin Lohitsiri, David Tong
This is not the latest submitted version.
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
| Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Nakarin Lohitsiri · David Tong |
| Submission information | |
|---|---|
| Preprint Link: | https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.08221v1 (pdf) |
| Date submitted: | 2019-08-06 02:00 |
| Submitted by: | Tong, David |
| Submitted to: | SciPost Physics |
| Ontological classification | |
|---|---|
| Academic field: | Physics |
| Specialties: |
|
| Approach: | Theoretical |
Abstract
We explore the phase structure of the Standard Model as the relative strengths of the SU(2) weak force and SU(3) strong force are varied. With a single generation of fermions, the structure of chiral symmetry breaking suggests that there is no phase transition as we interpolate between the SU(3)-confining phase and the SU(2)-confining phase. Remarkably, the massless left-handed neutrino, familiar in our world, morphs smoothly into a massless right-handed down-quark. With multiple generations, a similar metamorphosis occurs, but now proceeding via a phase transition. In the second half of the paper we introduce a two-parameter extension of the Standard Model, a chiral gauge theory with gauge group U(1) x Sp(r) x SU(N). We again explore the phase structure of the theory as the relative strengths of the Sp(r) and SU(N) gauge couplings vary.
Current status:
Reports on this Submission
Anonymous Report 2 on 2019-9-19 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:1907.08221v1, delivered 2019-09-19, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.1190
Strengths
1. Clear and well written
2. answers an interesting question with interesting results
Report
The authors study what happens when the weak interactions of the standard model (and a variety of closely related models) become stronger than the strong interactions. The find that the low energy physics is smooth for one generation but has either a discontinuity or intermediate phase for more than one generation. This is a delightful paper and should certainly be published.
Requested changes
1. it would be nice for younger readers if the authors could provide references for `t Hooft anomaly matching and the SU(2) anomaly discussed at the bottom of page four
typos:
2. "describes" near the bottom of page three has an extra "s"
3. page nine: "this is condensate in breaks" should be "this condensate breaks"
4. bottom of page thirteen: "The are" should be "They are"