SciPost Submission Page
The derivative expansion in asymptotically safe quantum gravity: general setup and quartic order
by Benjamin Knorr
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
| Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Benjamin Knorr |
| Submission information | |
|---|---|
| Preprint Link: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.11336v2 (pdf) |
| Date accepted: | Aug. 23, 2021 |
| Date submitted: | July 22, 2021, 3:45 p.m. |
| Submitted by: | Benjamin Knorr |
| Submitted to: | SciPost Physics |
| Ontological classification | |
|---|---|
| Academic field: | Physics |
| Specialties: |
|
| Approach: | Theoretical |
Abstract
We present a general framework to systematically study the derivative expansion of asymptotically safe quantum gravity. It is based on an exact decoupling and cancellation of different modes in the Landau limit, and implements a correct mode count as well as a regularisation based on geometrical considerations. It is applicable independent of the truncation order. To illustrate the power of the framework, we discuss the quartic order of the derivative expansion and its fixed point structure as well as physical implications.
Author comments upon resubmission
I would like to once again thank all the referees for their time and constructive comments. The raised points have been addressed in the individual replies to the referees. Beyond the changes mentioned there, some typos have been fixed and references have been updated to include publication information.
I decided against removing some part of section 3 to keep the paper as self-contained as possible. Most of the material in this section is needed to understand the regularisation employed in this paper. The section also resolves some of the confusion in the literature, in particular regarding the trace in the transverse subspace of vector fields (see ref. [151]). Moreover it contains some explicit intermediate results like the trace of the Faddeev-Popov ghost that the referee of report 3 argues are necessary.
I decided against removing some part of section 3 to keep the paper as self-contained as possible. Most of the material in this section is needed to understand the regularisation employed in this paper. The section also resolves some of the confusion in the literature, in particular regarding the trace in the transverse subspace of vector fields (see ref. [151]). Moreover it contains some explicit intermediate results like the trace of the Faddeev-Popov ghost that the referee of report 3 argues are necessary.
List of changes
See the individual replies to the referees. Short summary:
- The notation has been made consistent.
- A discussion of the problems related to obtaining universal results in the background field approximation has been added.
- Some clarifications have been added where necessary, and typos have been fixed. Indices have been relabelled where they could have lead to confusion.
Current status:
Published
Editorial decision:
For Journal SciPost Physics Core: Publish
(status: Editorial decision fixed and (if required) accepted by authors)
Reports on this Submission
Report
The author has responded to the points I raised.
In particular, the new paragraph in the end of sect. 7.2 is useful, but why does the author say "This leads to the conjecture that such minimal gauge fixings might generally not need Ward identities to obtain such a result." This is a fact, not a conjecture.
Furthermore, does the author think that reproducing the universal results is important or not? If the answer is positive, should we not prefer the schemes that have this property?
In particular, the new paragraph in the end of sect. 7.2 is useful, but why does the author say "This leads to the conjecture that such minimal gauge fixings might generally not need Ward identities to obtain such a result." This is a fact, not a conjecture.
Furthermore, does the author think that reproducing the universal results is important or not? If the answer is positive, should we not prefer the schemes that have this property?
Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 2) on 2021-8-2 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:2104.11336v2, delivered 2021-08-02, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.3327
Report
The paper looks properly revised and I would recommend publication. However there is one point that I overlooked in my previous reading, which is about the running of the coefficient of the Gauss-Bonnet term. The author claims that the fact that the beta function for this term is independent of the coefficient and it diverges (its inverse goes to zero) is first discovered in this paper. I would like to point out that this fact is already pointed out in
K. Falls, N. Ohta and R. Percacci,
``Towards the determination of the dimension of the critical surface in asymptotically safe gravity,''
Phys. Lett. B {\bf 810} (2020), 135773 [arXiv:2004.04126 [hep-th]].
This fact should be properly cited before the publication.
K. Falls, N. Ohta and R. Percacci,
``Towards the determination of the dimension of the critical surface in asymptotically safe gravity,''
Phys. Lett. B {\bf 810} (2020), 135773 [arXiv:2004.04126 [hep-th]].
This fact should be properly cited before the publication.