SciPost Submission Page
Probing multiparticle unitarity with the Landau equations
by Miguel Correia, Amit Sever, Alexander Zhiboedov
This is not the latest submitted version.
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
Authors (as registered SciPost users):  Miguel Correia 
Submission information  

Preprint Link:  https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.12100v1 (pdf) 
Date submitted:  20220106 21:51 
Submitted by:  Correia, Miguel 
Submitted to:  SciPost Physics 
Ontological classification  

Academic field:  Physics 
Specialties: 

Approaches:  Theoretical, Computational 
Abstract
We consider the $2\to 2$ scattering amplitude of identical massive particles. We identify the Landau curves in the multiparticle region $16m^2 \leq s, t < 36m^2$. We systematically generate and select the relevant graphs and numerically solve the associated Landau equations for the leading singularity. We find an infinite sequence of Landau curves that accumulates at finite $s$ and $t$ on the physical sheet. We expect that such accumulations are generic for $s,t > 16m^2$. Our analysis sheds new light on the complicated analytic structure of nonperturbative relativistic scattering amplitudes.
Current status:
Reports on this Submission
Anonymous Report 2 on 2022324 (Invited Report)
 Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:2111.12100v1, delivered 20220324, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.4758
Strengths
1 The paper is comprehensible and wellmotivated, the goals are stated clearly.
2 The organisation of the paper is optimal, with a review section, followed by the core and a more speculative section at the end. Many appendices are provided with detailed algorithms and explicit computations.
Weaknesses
1 Although the algorithms for the computations are very detailed in the appendices, it could be useful to post it on a public repository/attach it to the publication. This might help reproduce and extend the results in the future.
2 Some of the conjectures put forward in the discussion session sound a bit mysterious and need clarifications.
Report
In the paper, the Landau curves of several Feynman integrals are studied. In particular, the focus is on the integrals contributing to the fourparticle cuts for which the solution of the Landau equations can be found on the physical sheet. Assuming that there are no bound states with mass smaller than $2m$ and a $\mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetry, it is argued that the set of Landau curves is complete in the kinematical region under consideration and that these curves are a nonperturbative feature of the Smatrix. Remarkably, the authors found two families of curves (corresponding to planar and nonplanar graphs respectively, with a chain of triangles) that accumulate on the same Landau curve. They argue that this accumulation feature is universal above the multiparticle threshold.
Definitely, the article deserves to be published after a few clarifications.
Requested changes
1 In Section IV.A, the connection of this work with the LPMA conjecture is discussed. The statement of this conjecture, as presented in the section, is quite confusing. The definition of the physical sheet, given in the introduction, and the infinite set of Landau curves in it (besides threshold branch points and simple poles) seem to be incompatible with the statement presented in the paragraph. The authors may clarify this point.
2 In Section IV.C, a conjecture for the $\alpha$positive Landau curves for the lightest particles scattering is proposed. This conjecture seems to be very strong beyond the fourparticle cut when we consider Feynman integrals involving intermediate states with a mass larger than $2m$. The authors may discuss this further or refine their statement.
3 A related comment to the previous one is about the conjecture in Section IV.E. Do the authors expect the Landau curves associated with the graphs in Figure 6, with the internal lines being heavier states, to be also accumulation points? Also, it seems from the discussion that the conjecture goes beyond the restriction to $\mathbb{Z}_2$symmetric scattering. The authors may refine also this statement.
Anonymous Report 1 on 202239 (Invited Report)
 Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:2111.12100v1, delivered 20220309, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.4648
Report
Dear Editor,
the authors study the analytic structure of the 2>2 scattering amplitude in complex s and t. While at t=0 it is known that the amplitude is analytic in s, for finite t this remains an open problem. Unitarity implies the existence of a necessary st double discontinuity which the authors investigate via Landau equations. Using graphtheoretical methods they identify the endpoints of possible branch cuts in st, up to the 4particle threshold. They identify a small class of graphs which contributes nontrivially to the discontinuity, and compute the associated Landau curves.
This work represents a small but important step in the ambitious program of solving the unitarity equations nonperturbatively. Indeed the modern incarnation of the SMatrix Bootstrap relies on an extended st analyticity domain for which the present work is relevant. In addition, the wellwritten manuscript documents extremely well the work done and carefully positions it in relation to previous (sometimes almost forgotten) literature. Therefore I’m happy to recommend it for SciPost publication.
I have a few comments that could contribute to making the manuscript accessible to a wider audience.
1) I find that the text lacks a little bit in its introduction: the first small paragraph fails to bring enthusiasm to the nonexpert reader (some of it is left for the discussion, but might perhaps already be introduced here). Perhaps reference to the Mandelstam amplitude representation could be one of the selling points — in this case perhaps attention can be drawn to the little wedge at s,t>16m^2 that still lies below the first landau curves, and the importance of assessing whether it is free of nonanalyticity.
2) In section 2, graphs are used to keep track of the discontinuities of Landau equations. The same graphs are found in Feynman diagrams, when some of the legs (offshell) are contracted; since graphs and diagrams only keep track of the kinematics, the authors focus on Feynman Diagrams. I found this part slightly confusing: perhaps the notion of graph (and the difference with Feynman diagram) could be made clearer. Also, would this hold also for composite particles like pions? (I am not sure whether this is already addressed with the requirement that there be no boundstates…perhaps it depends on how boundstates are defined: poles below threshold?).
2) When Landau equations are introduced, perhaps it might be nice to remind that momenta can be complex and that point 3 (page 3) is reminiscent of the integration over Feynman parameters.
3) Perhaps in section 3, when the vertexdegree D is introduced, it might be worth recalling that (because of the notion of contractions introduced earlier), a high D can be found also in theories where the fundamental interaction is smaller than D.
4) In the conclusion, I find the discussion on lightestparticlemaximalanalyticity extremely interesting, although perplexing. How is it at all possible that all the subgraphs give vanishing contributions in bigger graphs? Could the authors give a few more hints of how they think this takes place?
5) Could the authors comment on what would happen if masses where not taken equal, or if the theory possess boundstates?
Typos:
point 2 in page 3, the m_i^2 shall have no index i.
page 11, 4 lines above start of appendix C: Given that it IS not alpha positive…
Author: Miguel Correia on 20220622 [id 2603]
(in reply to Report 1 on 20220309)(Attached updated manuscript)
Attachment:
Author: Miguel Correia on 20220622 [id 2601]
(in reply to Report 1 on 20220309)
We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and the useful comments and suggestions.
We now respond in detail to each comment:
1) Indeed, as suggested, mention is now made in the introduction to the question of the nonperturbative support of the double discontinuity (last paragraph in page 1).
2) We agree. The point is that Feynman diagrams have nonperturbative singularities, i.e. kinematic singularities which are due to unitarity, and which should be present in the full amplitude as well. The distinction between graph and Feynman diagram is that the former is a purely kinematic object where every line corresponds to the exchange of a onshell particle, whereas the latter is generically an offshell perturbative object, where vertices are associated with a specific Feynman rule, and internal lines are typically associated with fundamental fields in a Lagrangian. Hopefully this distinction is now made clear in the last paragraph of left column of page 3 and fourth paragraphs on the right column of page 3. Footnotes 8 and 9 were also added.
2) "complexvalued" was added to point 1. on the right column of page 3.
3) Footnote 12 was added in this context.
4) We don't exactly know what is the underlying mechanism that protects such anomalous features from lightest particle scattering. This seems to be the case however. We have added footnote 19 with a concrete example. We find an alphapositive solution for the equal mass case, which we would have found had we relaxed Z2 symmetry. However, as soon as internal masses are increased, we dont find any alphapositive solution. Somehow it seems that such anomalous features are sent to the second sheet if the external states are the lightest.
5) This is a interesting disccusion which the manuscript was originally lacking. We have consequently added two paragraphs to the end of section IV C., and another paragraph to the end of section IV E. In section IV H we also have included the second bullet point. In essence, the general mass case introduces unpleasant features such as anomalous thresholds which, from a practical point of view, makes our graph selection criteria harder to implement. Moreover there may be complex singularities in the physical sheet which evade an alphapositive analysis, which we have restricted ourselves to.
Typos were corrected.
Author: Miguel Correia on 20220622 [id 2602]
(in reply to Report 2 on 20220324)Reply to referee report 2:
We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and the useful comments and suggestions.
We now respond in detail to each comment: 1 Our analysis was restricted to the region where s,t are both real and larger than 16m^2. This means that the Landau curves that were found all lie on the real axis, in particular on top of the usual normal thresholds. Hopefully, this is now clear in the definition of LPMA (page 6 at the bottom).
2 Some diagrams in fig. 5 have internal bubbles, which are equivalent to heavier particles. In particular, the accumulation graph (red) exchanges an intermediate particle of mass 3m. All these curves obey monotonicity and are asymptotic to normal thresholds. This is however not the case if the external states become heavier, due to the presence of anomalous thresholds. Hopefully the two new paragraphs at the end of section IV. C make this clear (page 8).
3 Yes, we believe this to be a general feature. In fact, there is no distinction between the bubbles in Fig. 6 and single lines of heavier particles. Both yield the same Landau curves. A new paragraph was added to the end of section IV E. Also the discussion on going beyond Z2 symmetry was expanded in section IV H (1st point).
Attachment:
Landau_curves_inelastic.pdf