SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Phase space compression of a positive muon beam in two spatial dimensions

by A. Antognini, N. J. Ayres, I. Belosevic, V. Bondar, A. Eggenberger, M. Hildebrandt, R. Iwai, K. Kirch, A. Knecht, G. Lospalluto, J. Nuber, A. Papa, M. Sakurai, I. Solovyev, D. Taqqu, T. Yan

This is not the latest submitted version.

This Submission thread is now published as

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Ryoto Iwai
Submission information
Preprint Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21162v2  (pdf)
Date submitted: Aug. 22, 2025, 3:40 p.m.
Submitted by: Ryoto Iwai
Submitted to: SciPost Physics Core
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics - Experiment
  • High-Energy Physics - Experiment
  • High-Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Approach: Experimental

Abstract

We present the first demonstration of simultaneous phase space compression in two spatial dimensions of a positive muon beam, the first stage of the novel high-brightness muon beam under development by the muCool collaboration at the Paul Scherrer Institute. The keV-energy, sub-mm size beam would enable a factor 10$^5$ improvement in brightness for precision muSR, and atomic and particle physics measurements with positive muons. This compression is achieved within a cryogenic helium gas target with a strong density gradient, placed in a homogeneous magnetic field, under the influence of a complex electric field. In the next phase, the muon beam will be extracted into vacuum.

Current status:
Has been resubmitted

Reports on this Submission

Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2025-9-2 (Invited Report)

Strengths

The authors have reasonably modified the paper answering the previous comments (with the exception noted below.)

Report

The authors have reasonably modified the paper to respond to the previous comments. However, while they have provided some details for the estimates of the overall performance of the muCool compression scheme, they have not provided estimated uncertainties which are needed for interpretation of this information.

Recommendation

Ask for minor revision

  • validity: -
  • significance: -
  • originality: -
  • clarity: -
  • formatting: -
  • grammar: -

Author:  Ryoto Iwai  on 2025-09-12  [id 5808]

(in reply to Report 1 on 2025-09-02)

Dear reviewer,

Thank you for your comment.
We modified the text in Section 6 and added uncertainties for estimating efficiencies based on simulation.

Please let us know if you have further comments or suggestions.

Best regards,
muCool collaboration

Author:  Ryoto Iwai  on 2025-09-12  [id 5807]

(in reply to Report 1 on 2025-09-02)
Category:
answer to question

Dear reviewer,

Thank you for your comment.
We modified the text in Section 6 and added uncertainties for estimating efficiencies based on simulation.

Please let us know if you have further comments or suggestions.

Best regards,
muCool collaboration

Login to report or comment