SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Celestial Holography: Lectures on Asymptotic Symmetries

by P. B. Aneesh, Geoffrey Comp\`{e}re, Leonardo Pipolo de Gioia, Igor Mol, Bianca Swidler

This is not the latest submitted version.

This Submission thread is now published as

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Geoffrey Compère · Leonardo Pipolo de Gioia
Submission information
Preprint Link: scipost_202109_00027v1  (pdf)
Date submitted: 2021-09-21 21:14
Submitted by: Compère, Geoffrey
Submitted to: SciPost Physics Lecture Notes
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • High-Energy Physics - Theory
Approach: Theoretical

Abstract

The aim of these Lectures is to provide a brief overview of the subject of asymptotic symmetries of gauge and gravity theories in asymptotically flat spacetimes as background material for celestial holography.

Current status:
Has been resubmitted

Reports on this Submission

Anonymous Report 2 on 2021-11-9 (Invited Report)

  • Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:scipost_202109_00027v1, delivered 2021-11-09, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.3822

Report

This is a review on the subject of asymptotic symmetries, a theme of active research. It covers basic aspects of the general formulation of the problem and discusses in some detail a few important instances, including structure and significance of the BMS group in three and four dimensions.

The presentation is clear, although coincise, and may provide a good starting point for researchers interested in approaching the subject. The material is presented from an up-to-date perspective taking recent advances into account, e.g. the definition of ASG as including the asymptotic symmetries of all possible dual formulation of a theory or the role of subleading symmetries in accounting for memory effects.

I recommend publication in the present journal.

Requested changes

I spotted a few typos:

1. Eq (15) and four lines below: \phi_+ and \phi_- should probably carry additional labels (compare with previous page)
2. Below eq (28): ``with insight'' --> ``with hindsight'' (I guess)
3. Page 10, sentence starting at line 3; it seems a few words are missing: `` The central [charge] has therefore dimension[s of] inverse length''
4. Page 10, line 4 Poincare --> Poincaré
5. Page 11, line 2: path --> past
6. Page 11, beginning of section 2.3: the first sentences doesn't sound correct; maybe enough to change the first ``is'' into ``to''
7. Page 13, below eq (52): dotes --> dots
8. Page 14, below eq (57): ``where M(\theta, \phi) [...]'' sounds like the quantity M was introduced in the previous equations.

  • validity: -
  • significance: -
  • originality: -
  • clarity: -
  • formatting: -
  • grammar: -

Author:  Geoffrey Compère  on 2022-01-26  [id 2123]

(in reply to Report 2 on 2021-11-09)

Dear referee,
I would like to thank you for the detailed reading of our manuscript, and for the list of typos found. They have been all corrected in the new version.

Anonymous Report 1 on 2021-11-5 (Invited Report)

  • Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:scipost_202109_00027v1, delivered 2021-11-05, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.3803

Report

The Lectures cover the topic of asymptotic symmetries in gravity and gauge theories, and are aimed in particular at readers interested in celestial holography, which is a very timely topic. The review is very interesting and covers a large number of tpics - because of this it is not necessarily entirely self-contained - however the authors have clearly referenced the sources where the additional details can be found.

I recommend publication.
I only have a number of very small comments that could help with clarity:
- at the top of page 4, mention that n is the space-time dimension
- in eqn. 15, I think the phi's are missing superscripts
- in the paragraph ebove eqn (37), one of the r's should be t

  • validity: -
  • significance: -
  • originality: -
  • clarity: -
  • formatting: -
  • grammar: -

Author:  Geoffrey Compère  on 2022-01-26  [id 2124]

(in reply to Report 1 on 2021-11-05)

Dear referee,
I would like to thank you for the detailed reading of our manuscript, and for the list of typos found. They have been all corrected in the new version.

Login to report or comment