SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Dilaton in scalar QFT: a no-go theorem in 4-epsilon and 3-epsilon dimensions

by Daniel Nogradi, Balint Ozsvath

This is not the latest submitted version.

This Submission thread is now published as

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Daniel Nogradi
Submission information
Preprint Link: scipost_202201_00001v3  (pdf)
Date submitted: 2022-04-08 18:56
Submitted by: Nogradi, Daniel
Submitted to: SciPost Physics
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • High-Energy Physics - Theory
Approach: Theoretical

Abstract

Spontaneous scale invariance breaking and the associated Goldstone boson, the dilaton, is investigated in renormalizable, unitary, interacting non-supersymmetric scalar field theories in $4-\varepsilon$ dimensions. At leading order it is possible to construct models which give rise to spontaneous scale invariance breaking classically and indeed a massless dilaton can be identified. Beyond leading order, in order to have no anomalous scale symmetry breaking in QFT, the models need to be defined at a Wilson-Fisher fixed point with exact conformal symmetry. It is shown that this requirement on the couplings is incompatible with having the type of flat direction which would be necessary for an exactly massless dilaton. As a result spontaneous scale symmetry breaking and an exactly massless dilaton can not occur in renormalizable, unitary $4-\varepsilon$ dimensional scalar QFT. The arguments apply to $\phi^6$ theory in $3-\varepsilon$ dimensions as well.

Author comments upon resubmission

We would like to thank the referees for their comments and remarks. Following the suggestions of one of the referees we have added a new section on the 3-epsilon dimensional case where the interaction is phi^6. The same result applies as in 4-epsilon dimensions with phi^4 interaction. The 6-epsilon dimensional case with phi^3 interaction is briefly commented on.

List of changes

The title of the paper is extended and now is

"Dilaton in scalar QFT: a no-go theorem in 4-epsilon and 3-epsilon dimensions"

The abstract got an additional sentence "The arguments apply to phi^6 theory in 3-epsilon dimensions as well." too.

In section 1 an additional paragraph plus an additional sentence was added on the 3-epsilon phi^6 case.

Section 5 is new and is dedicated to the 3-epsilon dimensional phi^6 case.

The conclusion section (Section 6) is extended by 2 paragraphs, one about the 3-epsilon dimensional phi^6 case and a brief mention of the 6-epsilon dimensional phi^3 case.

We would like to thank the referee again for bringing up the other dimensions for discussion, we feel the additional results on phi^6 in 3-epsilon dimensions was a worthwhile addition.

The other referee had the following questions:

"Are there examples in the literature where dilatons are known in non unitary theories? Are such examples easy to construct? Perhaps a few comments in this direction might be added."

Fishnet CFT's are examples of non-unitary theories with a dilaton, which was already discussed in the introduction (Section 1). This construction can be thought of as the large-N limit of gamma-deformed N=4 SUSY Yang-Mills theory at strong deformation and weak coupling. The resulting theory is renormalizable and non-unitary and contains a dilaton. The discussion is also present in the Conclusion section.

We believe the addtions and modifications improved our paper and hence would like to thank both referees for their input.

In order to ease the next round of review of our manuscript we highlighted the added text in red.

Current status:
Has been resubmitted

Reports on this Submission

Anonymous Report 2 on 2022-4-20 (Invited Report)

Strengths

The arguments have improved

Weaknesses

It is still only applicable to scalar theories.

Report

The paper is short and has some remarks not seen elsewhere so I recommend publication

  • validity: -
  • significance: -
  • originality: -
  • clarity: -
  • formatting: -
  • grammar: -

Report 1 by Andreas Stergiou on 2022-4-14 (Invited Report)

Report

The authors' additions strengthen their manuscript significantly. This manuscript is well-written and contains enough new results to be published in SciPost Physics. I thus recommend publication.

  • validity: high
  • significance: good
  • originality: high
  • clarity: top
  • formatting: excellent
  • grammar: excellent

Login to report or comment