SciPost Submission Page
Superspin chains from superstring theory
by Nafiz Ishtiaque, Seyed Faroogh Moosavian, Surya Raghavendran, Junya Yagi
This Submission thread is now published as
|Authors (as registered SciPost users):
|Nafiz Ishtiaque · Seyed Faroogh Moosavian
We present a correspondence between two-dimensional N=(2,2) supersymmetric gauge theories and rational integrable gl(m|n) spin chains with spin variables taking values in Verma modules. To explain this correspondence, we realize the gauge theories as configurations of branes in string theory and map them by dualities to brane configurations that realize line defects in four-dimensional Chern-Simons theory with gauge group GL(m|n). The latter configurations embed the superspin chains into superstring theory. We also provide a string theory derivation of a similar correspondence, proposed by Nekrasov, for rational gl(m|n) spin chains with spins valued in finite-dimensional representations.
Published as SciPost Phys. 13, 083 (2022)
Submission & Refereeing History
You are currently on this page
Reports on this Submission
- Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:scipost_202202_00033v1, delivered 2022-08-16, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.5546
1- very clear
2- very systematic
1- collection of new and known results, not always clear which is which
The paper certainly meets the requirements for publishing.
The authors are very clear and present precise statements establishing as facts statements that were more or less already present in the literature at the level of vague conjectures.
To my knowledge this is the most complete dictionary of the gauge-Bethe correspondence. It is to be hoped (expected?) that it will lead to progress either in the study of supersymmetric gauge theories, or in integrable models, or both.
- Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:scipost_202202_00033v1, delivered 2022-04-06, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.4870
1. The paper is extremely well-organized and well-written. Whenever needed, concise and pedagogical reviews are given both on integrability and the brane construction of supersymmetric gauge theories, most of which I found more accessible than the ones that can be found in the literature.
2. Careful, detailed, and thorough analysis: detailed exposition is given on how the spin-chain description arises from the brane construction and the string duality. The authors are also careful on every detail and various subtle points (e.g. the difference between compact and non-compact representations.)
1. It certainly provides new perspectives on the Bethe/gauge correspondence and its relation to the 4d holomorphic Chern-Simons theory. However the analysis in this paper does not seem to lead to new results either in spin chain or supersymmetric gauge theories, at least for the moment. Of course, having a complete understanding on the subject is a stepping stone for the future discovery (and I personally feel that this will be the case), but it could be seen as a weak point of this paper.
2. The main achievement of the paper is extending the previous results on the relation between the Bethe/gauge correspondence and the 4d holomorphic Chern-Simons theory to spin chains with super-group symmetries. It is certainly of interest from a mathematical point of view, but the super-spin chain is a rather exotic object, not commonly found in the condensed matter system. So the relevance and the importance of the paper to a wide physics community could be debated.
This paper explains how the Bethe/gauge correspondence for the super spin chain proposed by Nekrasov can be understood from the 4d holomorphic Chern-Simons theory constructed by Costello. The key idea is to realize both in terms of intersecting branes and use the duality of string theory.
The results are new and important and the paper is well-written. So I think it is clearly above the scientific threshold for the publication in SciPost (and other journals). The only thing I would like to ask the authors is to clarify the point below.
1. In subsection 3.4.2, the authors explain the so-called fermionic duality of spin chains using the Hanany-Witten effects of branes. However, in the duality frame they use (which is given in (3.13)), there seem to be no NS5 branes although they use the NS5 branes in the discussion. I would like to ask the authors to clarify this point.