SciPost Submission Page
Functional flows for complex effective actions
by Friederike Ihssen, Jan M. Pawlowski
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
Authors (as registered SciPost users):  Friederike Ihssen · Jan M. Pawlowski 
Submission information  

Preprint Link:  scipost_202303_00029v1 (pdf) 
Date accepted:  20230601 
Date submitted:  20230323 17:54 
Submitted by:  Ihssen, Friederike 
Submitted to:  SciPost Physics 
Ontological classification  

Academic field:  Physics 
Specialties: 

Approach:  Theoretical 
Abstract
In the present work we set up a general functional renormalisation group framework for the computation of complex effective actions. For explicit computations we consider both flows of the Wilsonian effective action and the oneparticle irreducible (1PI) effective action. The latter is based on an appropriate definition of a Legendre transform for complex actions, and we show its validity by comparison to exact results in zero dimensions, as well as a comparison to results for the Wilsonian effective action. In the present implementations of the general approaches, the flow of the Wilsonian effective action has a wider range of applicability and we obtain results for the effective potential of complex fields in $\phi^4$theories from zero up to four dimensions. These results are also compared with results from the 1PI effective action within its range of applicability. The complex effective action also allows us to determine the location of the LeeYang zeros for general parameter values. We also discuss the extension of the present results to general theories including QCD.
Published as SciPost Phys. 15, 074 (2023)
Author comments upon resubmission
We thank the referees for their remarks and suggestions. The referees addressed two main questions:
1) What about out of equilibrium, complex action problems/open quantum systems?
The RG flows derived in the present manuscript are applicable to more general complex problems. This is a technical upgrade, a reduction of the number of coupled differential equations specific to theories with only a complex source does not hold anymore. We have added respective comments in the introduction (second paragraph, starting with 'The explicit applications ....') and picked up this point again in Section IV C on page 10, first paragraph, in which we use the reduction. The performance of the approach in a more general situation certainly depends on the details of the complex structure, but these are more technical, and not conceptual obstructions.
We have added references to more general complex problems.
2) Why does the 1PI flow perform so badly?
Numerically, the failure of the 1PI flow is linked to the nonalgebraic structure of the equation, which is explained in App. H, and is linked to the real part of (G)^2 ((propagator squared) becoming negative at finite RGscale k. We have added a reference to App. H to the description of Fig 1 (a) for clarification. In our current understanding this problem can be overcome within a full RGadaptation of the flow, including an adapted choice of the initial condition (the latter choice can be used to avoid flows that cross these singularities). The intricacy described above is directly linked to the nonalgebraic structure of 1PI flows, it is absent in flows for the Wilsonian effective action, hence the differences within the rather handson application of all these flows in the present work.
In short, we believe that the relative shortcomings of the 1PI flows are overcome in updates of the approach along the lines indicated above. While we have already done quite some work in this direction, we believe that our understanding has not matured enough to add more specific comments in the draft. However, we hope to report on this matter soon.
List of changes
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
Introduction, second paragraph, clarification on point 1):
The explicit applications in this work concentrate on the case complex sources, related to the LeeYang zeros mentioned above. We emphasise that the present complex action approach also accommodates quantum field theories with generic complex couplings. While also highly interesting e.g. in the context of PTsymmetric theories, explicit applications in this area will be discussed elsewhere. Here we only briefly discuss the minor technical differences within the numerical implementation of such flows.
Section II, third paragraph, references to more general complex problems (concerning point 1)):
The more general situation, which occurs for example in applications to open quantum systems or PTsymmetric theories \cite{doi:10.1063/1.5115323, Grunwald:2022kts}, will be discussed elsewhere.
Section IV C, first paragraph, clarification on point 1):
The present setup and in particular the final flow equation \labelcref{eq:FlowPol} can be readily applied to complex action problems with general complex couplings. Then, \labelcref{eq:FlowPol} is a partial differential equation for a general complex function $u(z)$ of a complex variable $z$. For complex classical couplings we find
%
\begin{align}
\overline{u(z)} \neq u(z)\,.
\label{eq:GenericCase}
\end{align}
%
Accordingly, \labelcref{eq:FlowPol} has to be solved for its imaginary and real part, while also implementing the holomorphicity constraint $\partial_{\bar z} u(z) =0$.
From now on we restrict ourselves to the case of complex currents. Then, \labelcref{eq:FlowPol} is a partial differential equation in the RGtime t and the complex spatial variable $z$. In principle, one could simply use the split of $z$ into its real and imaginary part, $z= x + \imag \ y $, and the respective split of the derivative, $ \partial_z = \frac{1}{2}(\partial_x  \imag \ \partial_y) $, for solving the equation on a twodimensional grid. However, this is a twodimensional representation of a onedimensional system, additionally necessitating the implementation of the holomorphicity constraint.
Section V, Figure 1, we have added a reference to App H (concerning point 2)).
Section VII (Summary), second paragraph, we have added a comment on point 2):
The numerical results for LeeYang zeroes have been obtained from RGadapted flows of the Wilsonian effective action. In turn, the naive implementation of the commonly used 1PI flow has a much smaller convergence radius in the complex plane. In our opinion, a fully RGadapted 1PI flow based on \labelcref{eq:GenFlow1PI} as well as a careful choice of the initial condition should resolve this issue, and we hope to report on this matter in the near future.
Submission & Refereeing History
You are currently on this page