SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

A Short Introduction to Cosmology and its Current Status

by Pedro G. Ferreira, Alexander Roskill

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Pedro Ferreira
Submission information
Preprint Link: scipost_202511_00041v1  (pdf)
Date submitted: Nov. 18, 2025, 8:23 p.m.
Submitted by: Pedro Ferreira
Submitted to: SciPost Physics Lecture Notes
 for consideration in Collection:
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • Gravitation, Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Approaches: Theoretical, Computational, Phenomenological, Observational

Abstract

The current cosmological model, known as the $\Lambda$-Cold Dark Matter model (or $\Lambda$CDM for short) is one of the most astonishing accomplishments of contemporary theoretical physics. It is a well-defined mathematical model which depends on very few ingredients and parameters and is able to make a range of predictions and postdictions with astonishing accuracy. It is built out of well-known physics - general relativity, quantum mechanics and atomic physics, statistical mechanics and thermodynamics - and predicts the existence of new, unseen components. Again and again it has been shown to fit new data sets with remarkable precision. Despite these successes, we have yet to understand the unseen components of the Universe and there has been evidence for inconsistencies in the model. In these lectures, we lay the foundations of modern cosmology.

Author comments upon resubmission

We thank for the referees for their comments which have helped us improve the manuscript. We are particularly grateful to one of the referees who went well above the call of duty to give us extensive comments and suggestions. While we did not include all the suggested changes, we would like to acknowledge him/her by name in the manuscript acknowledgements.

List of changes

The list of comments were far to extensive for us to list them here individually. As mentioned above, we have included most (if not all) of them.
Current status:
In voting

Login to report


Comments

Anonymous on 2025-11-19  [id 6049]

Not sure whether “Hubble constant” should be changed to “Hubble parameter”. I’ve sometimes read that “constant” is a misnomer since, in general, it is not constant in time. While that is true, the reason why it is called a constant is that it is like the constant a in y=ax, in contrast to y and x, which are variables. So the law is v=HD and H is the constant while v and D are variables. That H can change with time is a different issue.